On his week-long tour of Asia, US Vice President Mike Pence has been promoting a vision of a “free and open” Indo-Pacific region, characterized by unimpeded trade flows, freedom of navigation and respect for the rule of law, national sovereignty and existing frontiers.
The question is whether this vision of an Indo-Pacific free of “authoritarianism and aggression” is achievable.
One country that seems willing to contribute to realizing this vision is Japan. Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is the originator of the “free and open Indo-Pacific” concept that lies at the heart of US President Donald Trump’s new strategy, the successor to former US president Barack Obama’s unhinged “pivot” to Asia.
Having historically punched above its weight internationally, Japan is responding to China’s muscular rise by strengthening its own position in the region. Taking advantage of its considerable assets — the world’s third-largest economy, substantial high-tech skills and a military that has recently been freed of some legal and constitutional constraints — Japan is boosting its geopolitical clout.
Japan’s world-class navy has already begun operating far beyond the country’s waters in order to establish its position in the region. For example, in order to challenge China’s claims in the South China Sea, a Japanese submarine and three destroyers carried out naval drills there in September.
“Japan’s willingness to participate in Asian security makes it an increasingly important player in the region,” former US secretary of Defense Ashton Carter said recently.
However, creating a free and open Indo-Pacific is not the job of one country alone. Establishing the stable balance of power needed to realize Pence’s vision would require all of the region’s major democracies — from Japan and India to Indonesia and Australia — to come together.
The good news is that Abe seems to recognize the importance of cooperation among Asia’s democratic powers.
For example, in discussing the natural alliance between the region’s richest democracy and its largest one, he saod: “A strong India benefits Japan, and a strong Japan benefits India.”
With that in mind, Abe and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a summit that opened the way for a military logistics pact that would give each country’s armed forces access to the other’s bases.
Beyond instituting a joint “two plus two” dialogue among the countries’ foreign and defense ministers, Abe and Modi agreed to deepen naval and maritime security cooperation and collaborate on projects in third countries, including Myanmar, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, to enhance strategic connectivity in the Indo-Pacific.
At the summit, Japan and India devised a new motto for the bilateral relationship: “Shared security, shared prosperity and shared destiny.”
The comfort and camaraderie shown by Abe and Modi during their meeting, held at Abe’s private vacation home near Mount Fuji, stood in stark contrast to the stony expressions and somber handshakes on display when, just two days earlier, Abe had met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing.
Cooperation between India and Japan builds on, among other things, the trilateral India-Japan-US Malabar naval exercises. It has become an important component of the effort to defend freedom of navigation and overflight in the Indo-Pacific region, through which two-thirds of global trade travels.
If India signed a military logistics agreement with Japan, as it has with the US, the Indian navy would be better able to expand its footprint to the western Pacific, while enabling Japan to project its naval power in the Indian Ocean.
Fortunately, relations among the Indo-Pacific’s four key maritime democracies — Australia, India, Japan and the US — are stronger than ever, characterized by high-level linkages and intelligence sharing.
These countries should institutionalize their “quad” initiative, with the India-Japan dyad forming the cornerstone of efforts to pursue wider collaboration in the region.
However, such collaboration will face considerable obstacles. For starters, the relationship between Japan and the US’ other closest East Asian ally, South Korea, continues to be held hostage by history.
The issue of “comfort women,” Korean women who were coerced into providing sexual services to Japanese troops during World War II, has long been particularly contentious.
A 2015 agreement, endorsed by Abe and then-South Korean president Park Geun-hye, claimed to resolve the issue “irreversibly”: Japan offered its apology and ¥1 billion (US$8.8 million at the current exchange rate) for a fund created to help the victims.
However, earlier this year, Park’s successor, South Korean President Moon Jae-in, rejected the deal, saying that it did not adequately serve the victims or the public.
More recently, the South Korean Supreme Court ordered a major Japanese steelmaker to compensate the “victims of forced labor” during Japan’s colonial rule of Korea, even though a 1965 bilateral agreement was supposed to have settled “completely and finally” all such claims.
The rancorous relationship between Japan and South Korea plays directly into China’s hands. While South Korea obviously should not disregard its history, it should find a way to move past its colonial subjugation and form new, mutually beneficial relationships with Japan, much as Taiwan, India, the Philippines and Indonesia have done with their former colonizers.
Another potential impediment to a concert of Indo-Pacific democracies is domestic instability in key countries.
For example, in strategically located Sri Lanka, Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena has ousted Sri Lankan prime minister Ranil Wickremesinghe (despite the latter’s parliamentary majority) and called a snap election, even though the constitution does not give him the power to do either.
A weakening of the country’s democracy could have strategic ramifications for an economically integrated, but politically divided Indo-Pacific.
Nonetheless, the deepening relationship between Japan and India serves the goal of forestalling the emergence of a China-centric Asia.
If Japan and India — after China, the region’s most influential countries — can leverage their relationship to generate progress toward a broader concert of democracies in the region, the vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific might be achievable after all.
Brahma Chellaney is a professor of strategic studies at the Centre for Policy Research in New Delhi and a fellow at the Robert Bosch Academy in Berlin.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused