According to the latest report by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the world’s main scientific authority on global warming, keeping global temperatures from rising more than 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels is a feasible goal. The IPCC’s stance represents a move in the direction of the kind of “radical realism” that many civil society actors have long advocated.
The IPCC does not bet on geo-engineering proposals — for example, deep-ocean sequestration of massive amounts of atmospheric carbon dioxide, or “dimming the sun” by spraying the atmosphere with aerosols — to combat global warming. These largely theoretical solutions could have untold consequences for people and ecosystems, worsening not only the climate crisis, but also the other social and ecological crises we face.
Instead, the IPCC focuses on how we can avoid crossing the 1.5°C threshold in the first place. We must, it asserts, decarbonize the global economy immediately to ensure that global carbon dioxide emissions decline by about 45 percent by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050.
Achieving this would require not just transforming economic activity, but also confronting destructive power dynamics and social inequalities.
Radical Realism for Climate Justice, a new anthology published by the Heinrich Boll Foundation, sets out strategies developed by international civil society and social movements to bring about such change.
In line with the IPCC’s core message, we urgently need a politically managed decline in fossil fuel production. This means putting a brake on oil, coal, and gas production and exploration.
As the group Oil Change International says, it does not mean abrupt or panicked action that could lead to a “sudden and dramatic shut-down of fossil fuel production, stranding assets, damaging economies, and harming workers and communities reliant on the energy sector.”
In building up the renewable energy sector, we should avoid replicating systems that have driven inequality and entrenched damaging power dynamics in the fossil fuel sector and other industries. This means replacing the market-based, investor-focused approach to energy production with one that treats energy as a public good, while engineering a shift toward social ownership and management of energy supplies.
Rooted in energy sovereignty and self-determination, this approach would spur faster decarbonization, including by weakening vested interests’ power to resist change. It would also facilitate the restructuring of energy systems to serve social and ecological needs.
Another system-level transformation that would facilitate major emissions reductions would be the creation of a zero-waste circular economy, whereby everything we produce and consume returns safely to nature or is recycled and reused.
Consider textiles production, which in 2015 generated greenhouse gas emissions totaling 1.2 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents.
These massive emissions — more than the combined total for all international flights and maritime shipping — reflect a “fast fashion” culture that produces garments as cheaply as possible, with the expectation of constant turnover in people’s wardrobes. If each garment were replaced half as often, the industry’s total greenhouse gas emissions would plummet by 44 percent.
A zero-waste circular economy for textiles would include not just more use of the clothes that are produced, but also improved recycling and repurposing of materials, to avoid emissions-producing waste disposal processes such as incineration. The biggest gains would come from the introduction of less wasteful production processes.
Important steps should also be taken regarding land use, encompassing agriculture and zoning changes.
As the international peasant’s movement La Via Campesina shows, the industrial food system’s emissions — including those from production, fertilizers, transport, processing, packaging, cooling and food waste, as well as from deforestation associated with the expansion of industrial agriculture — account for 44 to 57 percent of the global total.
A peasant agroecological production system based on food sovereignty, small-scale farming and agroecology could, La Via Campesina says, halve carbon emissions from agriculture within a few decades.
This approach is proven to work: small-scale farmers, peasants, fishers, indigenous communities, rural workers, women and youth already feed 70 percent of the world’s population, while using only 25 percent of its agricultural resources.
There is also a need to restore natural ecosystems that have been destroyed. Forests and peatlands, in particular, can sequester several hundred gigatonnes of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Their restoration would protect not just biodiversity, but also local people, including the indigenous communities whose land-tenure rights have been systematically violated.
Retaining and expanding the land area under management by indigenous peoples and local communities could protect more than 1,000 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide worth of carbon stocks.
According to a report by the Climate, Land, Ambition, and Rights Alliance, ecosystem-based approaches in the land sector and agroecological changes to food production and consumption systems — including more local ownership — could deliver 13 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per year in avoided emissions, and almost 10 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent annually in sequestered carbon by 2050.
The result would be 448 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide in cumulative removals by 2100 — about 10 times present global annual emissions.
Limiting global temperatures to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels is our best hope of containing the effects of a climate crisis born of historical injustices and deep-rooted inequities.
The only way to succeed would be to undertake a shift to a new socioeconomic system. This means abandoning the single-minded obsession with GDP growth — which has facilitated the proliferation of wasteful production and consumption patterns and fueled economic and social inequality and injustice — in favor of a public goods approach that serves genuinely to make people’s lives better.
Demanding such a transformation is not “naive” or “politically unfeasible.” It is radically realistic. It is the only way we can achieve social justice, while protecting our environment from devastating climate change.
Barbara Unmussig is president of the Heinrich Boll Foundation.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused