Taiwanese chipmaker United Microelectronics Corp (UMC) in September was indicted under the US Economic Espionage Act for alleged theft and use of trade secrets from US firm Micron Technology Inc.
As the case involves UMC’s collaboration with China’s Jin Hua Integrated Circuit Co — which counts China’s Fujian Province as a stakeholder — UMC might also have breached the National Security Act (國家安全法).
The government should conduct a thorough investigation.
According to Article 5-1 of the act, “any person who intends to endanger national security or social stability and commits an offense specified in Article 2-1 shall be sentenced to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years, or short-term imprisonment; in addition thereto, a fine of not more than NT$1 million [US$32,455] may be imposed.”
Article 2-1 of the act states: “People are prohibited from ... developing an organization for official use of a foreign country or mainland China, for its militaries, party duties, or other official organizations, or the institutions established and specified by the foresaid organizations, or the civil groups entrusted by the foresaid organizations.”
By collaborating with Jin Hua, which was established by the Fujian provincial government, and by recruiting engineering staff, UMC’s actions might be deemed to constitute “developing an organization” in China.
If the goal of developing the organization was to steal commercial secrets, this would have caused damage to normal business operations and therefore could be deemed to have “endangered social stability.” In that case, Article 5-1 of the act would come into play.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and her administration’s industrial policy do not pay enough attention to the protection of intellectual property (IP) rights. The government should use the UMC case as justification to launch criminal prosecution to establish a legal precedent that would make it illegal for Taiwanese companies to engage in any activity that would help China conduct industrial espionage. This would also help to keep Beijing’s “united front” tactics in check and ensure that any Taiwanese interacting with Chinese organizations remain vigilant.
Siliconware Precision Industries chairman Bough Lin (林文伯) has complained to the media that when Micron established a wafer packaging company, it engaged in similar activity by head-hunting staff from other companies, yet the government did not seek to punish it.
However, this is a false comparison: Headhunting is not the same as stealing commercial secrets.
In a normal headhunting scenario, employees are not asked to steal information from the companies they are leaving. This is quite different from what happened in the UMC case.
Moreover, the criminal behavior alleged to have been undertaken by UMC took place in 2015 and 2016, and was not linked to the US-China trade dispute.
Therefore, it should be treated as a normal economic crime.
Chinese economic espionage is nothing new, although the UMC case is the first time that Beijing has used a Taiwanese company to do its dirty work.
The Tsai administration must take action to maintain a healthy investment environment for Taiwan’s tech sector, and it must stop turning a blind eye to the pilfering of research and technical achievements.
Chen Ping-hsun is an adjunct professor at Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of Technology.
Translated by Edward Jones
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US