The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Tuesday did the sensible thing and revised its guidelines governing emergency assistance to Taiwanese traveling abroad, which has long been abused by the public for trivial matters, thanks to a loose definition of “emergency.”
Unlike their foreign counterparts, Taiwanese diplomats live in constant fear of losing another of the nation’s diplomatic allies to Beijing and are burdened with the overwhelming task of having to fend off Chinese pressure at almost every international event.
Despite their seemingly impossible job descriptions, what really frustrates most diplomats posted overseas is probably their experience in carrying their office’s emergency hotline phone.
While the hotline is supposed to be for emergencies only, some diplomats’ experiences suggest the public clearly thinks otherwise.
One diplomat said he once received a call from a Taiwanese student in the middle of the night because he feared his roommate could hurt him. As the student sounded like he was in imminent danger, the diplomat instructed him to call the local police station immediately, but he refused.
The envoy felt he had no choice but to continue pacifying the student, only to realize later that the student’s fear could have been just imaginary, as nothing happened during the long phone call.
Another diplomat said she received a call from a Taiwanese tourist who left her wallet at a restaurant and asked for help to retrieve it, as she was already on a train to another city.
Fearing that a refusal to help could have ended up on the news, the envoy helped the tourist telephone the restaurant to see if it had the wallet, before making a 30-minute train trip to pick up the wallet herself.
Both cases should have been dealt with by local police, or the friends or parents of the people involved. Instead, diplomats trained to handle diplomatic crises and issues of national interest are forced to act as babysitters for those who do not know how to take care of themselves when overseas.
Ministry statistics offer a rough idea of the extent of the problem.
Of the more than 65,000 calls received last year by the emergency call center at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport, just 700 could be categorized as true emergencies, ministry Secretary-General James Lee (李光章) said.
That means only one in every 100 people who phoned the emergency center were actually in an emergency.
Lee said the percentage of non-emergency calls made to the emergency hotlines of consular offices might be lower, but only sightly.
To make matters worse, Taiwan’s populist culture makes it extremely difficult, if not risky, for diplomats to turn down even the most absurd requests for assistance, which has in turn reinforced the public’s misconception about the role of consular offices.
“Inconvenience does not equal emergency” is the message Lee wants to deliver to the public through the ministry’s revised guidelines, under which consular offices are now only required to provide help in the event of an incident involving personal safety, such as a kidnapping, sexual assault or murder.
It could take a while for that message to sink in. Until it does, consular staff are going to have to learn to say no.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers