With the government’s New Southbound Policy in full swing and numerous initiatives designed to benefit people from Southeast Asia — as well as to open up business opportunities for Taiwanese firms there — the poor treatment of migrant workers from the region is an issue that cannot be ignored.
A group of about 100 migrant workers on Sunday staged a protest in front of the Ministry of Labor, calling for legislation requiring employers to separate workers’ dormitories from factory complexes to improve safety.
It was the fifth such protest since May, after eight workers and six firefighters were killed in factory fires between December last year and April.
Workers at the protests spoke of unsafe conditions caused by dorms being connected to factories, with one worker at a Taoyuan factory saying that his dormitory does not even have a fire exit.
The ministry on Thursday last week said that while it is working on solving the problem, “a ban on on-site factory dormitories is not to be imposed any time soon, because it would require changes to the regulations, which must be preceded by inter-ministerial discussions.”
The statement implies that the discussions, which were promised by the government after the first protest nearly six months ago and repeated after every subsequent demonstration, have yet to happen, or at least make any headway.
Migrant workers have accused the government of stalling on the issue, as they cannot vote, but procrastination seems to be the government’s modus operandi regarding a slew of issues, including drawing up legislation for same-sex marriage, which it had promised to deliver by the end of last year.
The dormitory problem is more than a safety issue, as the hot air blowing from factory machinery running 24 hours a day makes living conditions at the dorms “unbearable,” workers have said.
To the government’s credit, the ministry in July improved the guidelines for the dormitories, increasing the area per worker from 3.2m2 to 4.6m2 and bathroom allotments from one per 15 workers to one per six.
Factory owners were reportedly “enraged” by the changes, saying that they would affect their profits, which is a ludicrous claim given that migrant workers can be asked to pay up to NT$5,000 per month for cramped and unsafe accommodation.
Moreover, the companies already make massive savings by hiring migrants, who work for far lower wages than Taiwanese and usually work 12 hours per day or more.
This is not a business issue, this is a human rights issue. And with Taiwanese firms looking to expand into Southeast Asia, whose consumer power is rapidly growing — Indonesia’s middle-class population has reached 50 million people, more than twice the population of Taiwan — it would be wise for companies here to treat the nearly 700,000 migrant workers with more respect.
The government last week announced that it would soon unveil new penalties for businesses that do not have proper safety measures for migrant workers. These should be closely scrutinized to make sure that they are effective and are not just a slap on the wrist.
However, it seems like the most important issue about which migrant workers are concerned is separating the dormitories from the factories.
The government must deliver on its promise and take the issue seriously instead of making the exact same statement after each protest.
However, it should act quickly, as factories would need time to implement any new guidelines, and nobody wants to see any more lives lost in the meantime.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS