Republic of China flag
A letter to the editor published on Wednesday last week suggests that the Republic of China (ROC) flag flown over Taiwan officially represented China from 1912 to 1949 (“Sing a song of Taiwan,” Oct. 17, page 8). The last part of the statement is incorrect.
From 1912 to 1928, China was represented by the five-color flag, which represented the major ethnic groups of China — unlike subsequent flags that emphasized the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) or Chinese Communist Party’s “vanguard” control.
The five-color flag was favored by writers Lin Yu-tang (林語堂) — based on the cover of his 1967 book Famous Chinese Short Stories — and Bo Yang (柏楊), whose preference was actually reported in the Taipei Times (“Change flag, anthem: Bo Yang,” July 15, 2004, page 3).
As a side note, the ROC’s national anthem was not Three Principles of the People during most of its pre-1928 history, but Song to the Auspicious Cloud, which celebrates periodic transfers of power as a means to revive a country.
Even though the early versions of the ROC flag and national anthem were removed by the KMT-based ROC because of their association with the horrible warlord-based Beiyang ROC government, the ideals espoused by the early flag and anthem seem to be more relevant to Taiwan than ever.
Taiwan has multiethnic groups whether they are Aborigines, Han settlers from various eras, or new immigrants from various parts of the world.
Additionally, Taiwan does have periodic elections that can invoke a transfer of power if the public elects that to happen.
Allen Chang
Hsinchu
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers