Yet another case of food safety violations was revealed on Tuesday and some are questioning whether the fines and regulations are adequate deterrents.
Eggs from Yi Jin King Co (義進金), one of the nation’s largest suppliers, were recalled after inspections allegedly uncovered excessive levels of nicarbazin — used to retard parasite reproduction — and fraudulent labeling. Prosecutors said that expired eggs were repackaged with new expiration dates, or mixed with non-expired eggs.
After inspections in April, egg supplier Yuanshan (元山蛋品) was found to have mixed fresh and expired eggs in liquid egg products. Yuanshan and other companies that failed inspections were fined NT$840,000 (US$27,176).
In December last year, egg supplier CJ-Taian Co (萇記泰安) was also found to have mixed fresh and expired eggs in liquid egg products. Suppliers are clearly willing to take the risk, knowing that they face only a small fine if caught.
Compare this with a 2015 incident in the US in which supplier Quality Egg was instructed to pay US$6.8 million after contaminated eggs from its Iowa facilities infected 56,000 people with salmonella. Company executive Jack DeCoster and his son were sentenced to three months in prison and each fined US$100,000.
Taiwanese courts send a confusing message by handling breaches of food regulations with different degrees of severity.
In 2015, Wei Ying-chun (魏應充), the former chairman of Ting Hsin Oil and Fat Industrial Co (頂新製油實業), was sentenced to two years in prison for his role in the company’s use of tainted oil in food products.
The two years — a reduced sentence granted on appeal by the Intellectual Property Court — was for tampering with food labels, the court said.
Why tampering with labels on egg products is treated so much less harshly than tampering with labels on oil products could be questioned, particularly as nobody came forward with claims of health issues caused by the oil products.
Eggs can become contaminated in a number of lethal ways, including with salmonella or listeria — two serious bacterial infections that can cause death in infants, those who are immunosuppressed and elderly people. Listeria infections can also lead to miscarriages, according to the WHO.
As the average Taiwanese consumes 322 eggs per year, the potential for contracting such an infection is high, especially given that egg production facilities are cramped and often fail inspections due to unsanitary conditions.
Exported food products that contain eggs should also be scrutinized. Due to the Ting Hsin oil scandal, Hong Kong authorities last year became stricter about the import of food products from Taiwan, particularly those containing a type of lard produced by Kaohsiung-based Chang Guann Co (強冠企業), which was found to contain recycled kitchen oil.
At the time, Hong Kong Food and Health Bureau Secretary Ko Wing-man (高永文) said that the territory would check Taiwan-made foods — such as pineapple buns from Maxim’s Cakes (美心西餅) — for questionable shortening.
Egg products made in Taiwan, such as salted eggs, preserved eggs (also known as “century eggs”), mooncakes and others, are exported around the world. A major food scandal involving the safety of Taiwanese eggs could harm the nation’s reputation and hamper exports, similar to what happened last year to the Netherlands when eggs from Dutch poultry farms were found to contain traces of the insecticide fipronil.
Taiwanese authorities must not treat cases of food contamination lightly — the safety of the public and the reputation of the nation are at stake.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers