The Arab world has a long tradition of commerce and enterprise. Yet, since achieving independence, many Arab countries have adopted state-led development models that have left their economies overly reliant on the government. This is unsustainable.
The Arab world’s economic model has endured, despite major setbacks in the 1990s, largely because the state employs a large share of workers and provides universal subsidies. This eliminates risk from citizens’ economic lives, entrenching their dependence on the government and stifling entrepreneurship and innovation. It also undermines the delivery of public services, stoking mistrust of the very government on which populations depend so heavily.
The Arab world’s state-led development model might be set to reach a breaking point as hundreds of millions of young people prepare to enter labor markets in the coming decades. With the public sector unlikely to be able to absorb these new workers, there is an urgent need to create a dynamic private sector that not only adopts, but also generates technological innovations that empower workers and deliver durable and inclusive growth.
This approach is in line with the demands of the Sustainable Development Goals, which were approved by all UN member states — including all Arab countries — in 2015. Achieving the goals — which range from eliminating hunger and poverty to protecting the environment — will require the involvement of dynamic private sectors that are capable of producing technological solutions and willing to provide critical financing.
Private-sector financing — say, of the infrastructure projects demanded by goal No. 9 — is particularly important in the Arab world, where many governments are already burdened by debt. To help mobilize that financing, the World Bank Group has launched the Maximizing Finance for Development program.
Of course, governments must also maximize their own resources. In the past, abundant investment and energy revenues limited the incentive to mobilize tax revenues. However, as government coffers are depleted, Arab countries — among the least efficient tax collectors in the world — are under growing pressure to pursue meaningful reform.
Arab governments must also boost the efficiency of their spending. As it stands, while most Arab countries spend a fair amount relative to their income levels, they achieve relatively poor outcomes, especially in health and education.
To improve the state’s functioning and regain citizens’ trust — developments that could facilitate tax collection — Arab governments should apply the concept of “value for money” to public administration. Such a framework for assessing the cost-effectiveness of public-sector activities requires that data about those activities be collected, assessed and disclosed in a transparent way. Mechanisms such as information-feedback loops would then enable authorities to identify quality issues and make improvements quickly.
Here, too, the World Bank Group is taking steps to help. Because investing in human capital is the most important long-term action a government can take, the Human Capital Project focuses on identifying the factors that are undermining the efficiency of investments in this area.
However, even before comprehensive data are available, some approaches for improving the efficiency of public spending and administration stand out. In particular, Arab countries can emphasize the localization of development. By improving the capacity of local governments to plan, finance and deliver key services, including health and education, countries could boost value for money, build confidence among citizens, and make significant strides toward achieving the goals.
A final area where reform is imperative is regulation. In many Arab countries, incumbent public and private firms — especially in critical sectors like financial services, telecommunications, and energy — enjoy significant advantages, including outright protection, onerous regulations that deter market entry by new players and inadequate limits on natural monopolies. This impedes competition and contestability, undermines the diffusion of general-purpose technology, and blocks the type of adaptation and evolution that a dynamic private sector requires.
Rather than control the economy outright, Arab governments should foster the emergence of independent yet accountable regulators that can help ensure improved economic outcomes. Of course, if history is any indication, the shift from a dirigiste state to a regulatory one will not be easy. However, experience offers useful lessons to guide this process. In any case, the regulatory “status quo” — which will condemn Arab youth to unemployment and disenfranchisement — is not an option.
This is all the more true at a time when tech giants like Facebook, Amazon, Tencent and Alibaba — with matchmaking-based business models turbo-boosted by digital technology — are propelling a shift toward “ultra-concentration.” In this context, building a dynamic private sector capable of providing opportunities to the Arab world’s young workers will require even more vigilant and effective regulators, operating within a smart regulatory framework that addresses issues relating to the collection and use of data.
It is often said that private-sector-led innovation is the key to enabling developing countries to leapfrog their way into the future, but this narrative should not be allowed to obscure the paramount importance of smart and innovative regulations to support such progress. The state’s role in Arab economies must improve, not diminish.
Mahmoud Mohieldin is World Bank group senior vice president for the 2030 Development Agenda, UN relations and partnerships. Rabah Arezki is chief economist for the Middle East and North Africa region at the bank.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers