Former Executive Yuan secretary-general Lin Yi-shih (林益世), who served during former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) time in office and who was convicted of “holding properties of unknown origin” in a corruption trial, has finally — following a drawn-out process of more than six years — been put behind bars, where he is to serve two years.
Meanwhile, an earlier sentence of 13 years and six months for receiving bribes in breach of official duties is still being appealed.
The glacial pace of prosecution against a senior official by Taiwan’s judicial system is baffling to many.
In 2010, when Lin was a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator, he helped Chen Chi-hsiang (陳啟祥), the owner of Ti Yung Co, secure a slag treatment contract from CHC Resources, a subsidiary of state-owned China Steel Corp, in exchange for NT$63 million (US$2.04 million).
Two years later, when he was the Executive Yuan secretary-general, Lin once again sought to exploit his official position to help Ti Yung renew its contract with CHC Resources and to become a third signatory in a contract with CHC Resources and Chung Yao Corp, this time asking Chen for a bribe of NT$83 million.
The size of the bribe alarmed the businessman and he brought it to the attention of the Special Investigation Division.
When the KMT led the former party-state, it used the judicial branch to deal with dangwai (黨外, “outside the party”) dissidents. During the Martial Law era under presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), the party condoned corruption by officials, as long as they were loyal and did as they were told.
Yet, was it not a former KMT official — then-KMT Evaluation and Discipline Committee director-general Chen Keng-chin (陳庚金) — who, after the KMT lost the most recent election, openly called on public servants to “goof around as much as possible and milk their jobs for all they are worth” to “drag down the government”?
Then it was reported that even Lin Hsi-shan (林錫山), who had been Legislative Yuan secretary-general under former legislative speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), was found to have been on the take. Is Taiwan really such a banana republic?
If Chen Chi-hsiang had not recorded incriminating conversations with Lin and provided Special Investigation Division investigators with irrefutable evidence of his corruption, Lin would have just denied everything. In the end, his whole family was implicated, with even his mother, Shen Juo-lan (沈若蘭), receiving a five-month term for destroying evidence.
At the time, Lin, one of Ma’s political proteges, was a wealthy man and member of a local political family in Kaohsiung. His family was well off, yet it showed little regard for the community’s poor and dispossessed, whom Lin was supposed to represent: For instance, his mother saw little problem in burning the money that her son had received in bribes.
For somebody of such means and social status to be so utterly corrupt makes society question the road it has traveled down. Then, to take money gained through exploitation and send it up in flames to remove any trace when one’s fingers are caught in the cookie jar is unconscionable behavior.
Lin and his family are as greedy as they are stupid. Hopefully, their example can serve as a warning to other officials and set errant officials back on the straight and narrow. Corruption in government harms the nation and, in the end, it will bring about the downfall of the corrupt.
Shih Ming-hsiung is a former political victim.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US