An “unsafe” maneuver by a Chinese destroyer on Sunday last week, which could have led to a collision with the USS Decatur in the South China Sea, is the latest sign of tensions in the region.
The US has designated China a strategic competitor. In addition to objecting to Beijing’s unilateral changes of the “status quo” in the South China Sea, the US is also keeping a close eye on China’s military expansion in the South China Sea, the Indian Ocean and the Middle East.
The formulation of its Indo-Pacific Strategy sets the Chinese communists as a potential opponent, and seeks to constrain their Belt and Road Initiative, militarization of the South China Sea, military activities around the first island chain, and to strengthen multilateral cooperation with countries such as India.
As such, the US is positioning itself in the Korean Peninsula, the East China Sea, the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea and the Indian Ocean, and developing a maritime security cooperation framework centered on Japan, Australia and India.
At the same time, it is lobbying Southeast Asian countries to reinstate US military bases, with the intention of providing a counterweight to China’s continued efforts to strengthen their economic presence and military deployment in the Indian Ocean.
As the trade war between China and the US intensifies, the US is continuing to dispatch fighters and ships to the South China Sea to demonstrate its freedom of navigation rights, and is also carrying out a range of drills in the region.
These efforts are aimed at checking China’s military expansion in the South China Sea, while demonstrating to other countries in the region its intention to maintain regional stability.
The US’ continued reinforcement of the links between the Indian and Pacific oceans is designed to increase deployment of its allies as part of the Indo-Pacific Strategy, and improve ties between India, Australia, Japan and ASEAN member states to form a US-led buffer against China’s rise.
Even though China is India’s largest trading partner, it is also conducting frequent submarine patrols in strategic waters in the Indian Ocean, as well as investing in ports in Pakistan and Sri Lanka, which could be regarded as, in part at least, military infrastructure and activity.
This has India feeling uneasy about China potentially changing the regional balance of power in the Indian Ocean, and it is looking for a possible way of dealing with the problem.
China is looking to transform itself into a maritime power, and up to this point the main strategic flashpoint between the US and China has been the first island chain in the South China and East China seas.
As the strategic competition between the two powers is ratcheted up in the Indian Ocean, they are competing in more ways than they are cooperating, making the situation in the Indian Ocean a destabilizing factor.
With the new challenges of the strategic competition in the South China Sea, Taiwan needs to be an active participant in regional activity.
As Taiwan is an important player in the region, it needs to continue strengthening its defenses and security cooperation with neighboring countries.
Taiwan has long had military exchanges with the US, and the scale of this military activity might increase, for example with joint search-and-rescue drills in the surrounding waters and airspace.
The greater the range of joint military exchanges the nation engages in, the more guarantees it will have.
Chang Yan-ting is an adjunct professor at National Defense University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past