On Sept. 24, the US Department of State, via the US Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency, notified the US Congress about a new batch of arms sales to Taiwan.
Information released by the agency did not include a detailed list of the items to be sold; it only said that the US would provide Taiwan with spare parts and repairs for a range of US-built military aircraft, along with support systems and related elements.
The agency estimated the total cost to be US$330 million.
The Ministry of National Defense has said that this batch of arms sales is a continuation of existing programs and falls under the procurement budget quota for standard aircraft parts for the next five years. Consequently, there has not been much discussion about it, but it does raise a number of important issues.
US arms sales to Taiwan over the past few years have been quite beneficial to Taiwan’s armed forces in terms of ammunition and systems. However, what Taiwan really wants to buy are mainstay operational platforms, the sale of which would carry political implications.
Disappointingly, there have so far been no more than whispers with regard to such major items.
Platforms sold to Taiwan by the US during the terms of the three presidents before US President Donald Trump could be summarized as follows:
During the administration of former US president Bill Clinton, US arms sales to Taiwan included E-2T Hawkeye airborne early-warning aircraft, Knox-class frigates, M60A3 Patton main battle tanks, AH-1W Cobra attack helicopters, OH-58D Kiowa scout helicopters and amphibious landing craft.
During former US president George W. Bush’s administration, the US sold Taiwan a PAVE PAWS long-range early-warning radar system, Kidd-class destroyers, P-3C maritime patrol and anti-submarine warfare aircraft, as well as AH-64E Apache attack helicopters.
The Bush administration also planned to sell Taiwan submarines, but the deal has still not gone through.
During former US president Barack Obama’s administration, the US sold Taiwan UH-60M Black Hawk utility helicopters, Osprey-class mine-hunting ships and Perry-class frigates, and it launched a program to upgrade Taiwan’s F-16A/B jets by retrofitting them to F-16V standards.
Under the Clinton and Bush administrations, the US supplied Taiwan with plenty of weapons that still serve Taiwan’s armed forces reliably. However, after Obama took office, arms sales took place less frequently and were subject to repeated delays.
There was even an unprecedented gap of more than four years during which the US did not sell Taiwan any arms.
Furthermore, the items sold gradually shifted to systems and ammunition, while major items were lacking.
In contrast, the US started delivering F-35 jets to Japan. After the US sold it key equipment, Japan started building its seventh and eighth destroyers equipped with the Aegis Combat System.
Last month, Japan received the most advanced E-2D version of the Hawkeye airborne early-warning aircraft.
The US has also started delivering F-35s to South Korea, and last month, Seoul obtained the US Departement of State’s approval to purchase six P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft, which are capable of both anti-submarine and anti-surface warfare.
Compared with Japan and South Korea, Taiwan is falling far behind.
In the past few years, large-scale plans have been proposed for Taiwan to develop a self-reliant defense industry. However, the country does not have sufficient technical capabilities or manufacturing capacity, so it must rely on the military and political synergistic effect that arms sales generate.
For example, all the mainstay destroyers of several other countries in the region, including the US, Japan, South Korea and Australia, and are now equipped with the Aegis Combat System. Taiwan should not go on being excluded from the Aegis club.
The US’ Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyers, which incorporate the Aegis system, have been in service for 27 years.
The US has exported the associated technology to many of its allies and it has repeatedly proved its maturity.
Taiwan’s navy has Kidd-class destroyers, which have strong combat capabilities, but the class is 38 years old.
Taiwan should try to not let this unfortunate situation drag on until its air defense destroyers with command-and-control capabilities are more than 50 years old. It should therefore aim to take advantage of the regional situation at a political level.
A secret budget already exists for purchasing M1A2 Abrams main battle tanks, and the purchasing plan could be announced and put into action at any time.
On the other hand, F-35Bs are too sensitive and it is impossible to predict when or if Taiwan would be able to buy them.
Having excluded these two items, it could be concluded that between now and 2020 Taiwan should make Arleigh Burke-class destroyers its main target for military procurement.
Wang Yueh-nien is a former military officer and think tank staff member.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US