Kayaking along canals to pick up your groceries, walking a few minutes to the metro station, or cycling down pedestrianized streets to meet the neighbors: If you want to live in Copenhagen’s North Harbour, a car would be obsolete.
That, at least, is the aim of architect Rita Justesen. Since 2007 she has been tasked with transforming the former industrial harbor in Denmark’s capital into a brand-new neighborhood, and ensuring its 3.5 million square meters of residential and commercial floor space is financially viable and climate-smart.
That means cars tucked away, inconveniently, in centralized carparks to discourage driving; more cycle paths; canals and harbor pools clean enough to swim in; and the construction of a well-connected metro station for its projected 40,000 residents and 40,000 workers by 2060.
As nations race to reach ambitious climate goals to lower carbon emissions, many cities have been looking to sustainable urban designs to help residents cut energy use, boost social well-being and cohesion, and cope with rising heat and flooding.
Designing spaces that acknowledge the impact of climate change can help to change behavior and make it easier for people to live greener lives, according to a report by the British Psychological Society.
“We said we would make a sustainable city ‘the Copenhagen way.’ That means that to live sustainably, it has to be easy. So that means short distances to the metro, shops and recreational functions,” said Justesen, lead architect at city council-owned firm By & Havn.
“We also really want to make an attractive district where people want to live and stay — that for us is also sustainable in the long term,” said Justesen, as she walked past construction sites in North Harbor, which has housed 1,500 residents since 2015.
Around the world, cities use more than two-thirds of the world’s energy and account for about three-quarters of carbon dioxide emissions, according to the UN.
With rapid urbanization, more than two-thirds of people will live in cities by 2050, the UN projects.
That is why cities are seen as key to meeting the commitment under the 2015 Paris Agreement of reducing emissions to keep the rise in global temperatures to “well below” 2°C above pre-industrial levels.
A 1.5°C rise would give vulnerable populations a chance of surviving climate shocks like flooding, cyclones, droughts and higher sea levels, experts say.
Worldwide, sea levels have risen 26cm since the late 19th century, driven up by melting ice and a natural expansion of water in the oceans as they warm, UN data show.
A UN panel of climate scientists said in 2014 that sea levels could rise by up to a meter by 2100.
Surrounded by open waters and prone to heavy rainfall, Copenhagen faces the same risks as low-lying, poorer cities.
The sea level around the harbor city is expected to rise by up to 1m over the next century, the Danish Meteorological Institute has said.
Copenhagen council estimated that if there were no form of protection from flooding due to storm surges, the damage over the next century would cost up to 20 billion Danish kroner (US$3.14 billion).
By comparison, it would cost up to 4 billion Danish krone to prevent this from happening.
Apart from future-proofing itself from the sea-level rise and flooding — from green roofs and parks that absorb rainwater, to large barriers that can curb flooding — the city is also on a mission to become the first capital to cut climate-changing emissions by 2025.
“If we look at global development, we see an increase in populations in cities, and it’s a really huge number. And if investments are not climate-friendly, then [climate change] will be impossible to solve,” said Jorgen Abildgaard, director of the city’s climate program.
Like Justesen, architect Peter Raaschou-Nielsen said creating spaces that help people cope with climate shocks has been at the core of all his designs at Danish firm Gehl.
However, fostering social cohesion and interactions are also crucial for sustainable cities of the future, he said.
“The projects I’ve been working on have had this focus on the environment — socially, financially, well-being, nature — to create better cities for the people living there and also to do something positive for the environment,” he said at his studio.
Raaschou-Nielsen cited the positive effects of a 2012 redevelopment project he worked on in the flood-prone town of Kokkedal, 30km north of Copenhagen.
Though the rundown area had a reputation for crime and gangs, it was revitalized through features like better lighting for improved safety, green spaces and community gardens.
“It’s no longer the ‘ghetto,’ but it’s transformed into lively neighborhoods with a new identity,” Raaschou-Nielsen said.
“It’s great that you can do a solution like that ... and at the same time you solve these climate challenges,” he said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers