For weeks, Sudesh Kumar had been having a sinking feeling. His driver’s license was about to expire. He knew the misery that lay ahead: taking time off his property rental business to line up for hours in the muggy heat, facing the chaos in the squalid government office and finally capitulating to the tout who promised to push through his application — for a price.
This time, it turned out to be as easy as ordering pizza. Kumar dialed 1076 and booked an appointment for a person from the Delhi government to come to his home.
The two men sat on the sofa of Kumar’s small house in Chattarpur while the representative took down Kumar’s details on a tablet, filled out a form, uploaded his ID card and photograph, and took his biometric data. Kumar paid the fee with his credit card.
“It was over in 15 minutes. I couldn’t believe how easy it was. In a few days’ time, my new driving license will come through the post,” he said. “Dealing with the government has turned from hell into heaven.”
Other residents of the Indian capital are equally stunned. The Delhi government, ruled by the Aam Aadmi (“Common Man”) Party, has rolled out a radical scheme, at a cost of 150 million rupees (US$2.08 million), to free the city’s 18 million residents from having to visit government offices — and reduce corruption.
Forty services, including applications for driving licenses, marriage certificates, pensions and water connections, are being delivered to people’s doorsteps.
A battalion of young male and female foot soldiers called “mobile sahayaks,” armed with tablets and cameras, carry out the appointments, whizzing around the city on scooters.
The fee is set deliberately low, at 50 rupees, and the service is available from 9am to 9pm, seven days a week. In three months’ time, the list of services is to be extended to 100.
A private company, VFS Global, which handles visa and passport services, has been hired to run the project.
Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal called the project a “revolution in governance,” while Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia said the aim was to ease the life of the common citizen.
“Usually, the citizen goes to the government,” Delhi Minister for Administrative Reforms Kailash Gahlot said. “We wanted to reverse this and take the government to the citizen. People waste so much time to get simple documents.”
On day one, the helpline received 21,000 calls. Of these, only 2,728 were answered and about 370 home visits were made.
The government reacted to what it called the “enormous response” by increasing the number of telephone operators from 40 to 150 and the number of lines from 50 to 200 in two days.
Some critics worry that the 50-rupee fee is too low to sustain the scheme.
Gahlot said that if the costs turn out not to be viable for VFS Global, the government would make up the difference to ensure the project’s long-term viability.
There have been teething problems. Trilok Sharma, a marketing agent in Janakpuri who wanted to apply for a new water connection, found that his mobile helpers could have done with more training.
“They didn’t seem familiar with the software or the options it kept showing, nor with government rules. I would have preferred more experienced people to handle it. It would be quicker,” Sharma said. “That said, it’s a wonderful thing to have happened to the city.”
Internet problems are also common. When mobile helper Pankaj Khanna turned up at the home of commerce student Riddhima Gauba in Saket to take her application for a learner’s license, the signal was so poor they had to leave the living room and stand on the balcony.
Even then, it took him some time to upload Gauba’s application and credit card payment.
Even when the Internet is working, the government server can be slow.
Sanjeev Oberoi, a technical manager with a US multinational, said that visiting a government office was synonymous with torture.
It often entailed waiting for hours and reaching the counter only to find the official had gone to lunch or left for the day.
However, when he applied for a duplicate driver’s license sitting in his Greater Kailash home this week, the experience “was a dream,” he said.
Oberoi is one of those who fears the low fee could make the operation unsustainable.
“They should charge more so that they can sustain it long term. It’s too good to endanger. It’s a great revolution in our lives and must be protected,” he said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers