Wearing a Hawaiian shirt and sipping an iced tea, Ongerung Kambes Kesolei sits at a veranda bar overlooking a hotel pool, under fans that slowly push humid air around on a quiet Sunday afternoon.
However, the calm of the scene is deceptive, for Kesolei is explaining that his small island home of Palau — a dot on the map in the northwest corner of the Pacific with a population of just over 20,000 people — has attracted the ire of one of the world’s most powerful nations and is now at the center of a geopolitical bunfight.
“They [China] want to weaken [President] Tsai Ing-wen [蔡英文] and that’s where Palau comes into play,” said Kesolei, the editor of one of Palau’s two newspapers.
Illustration: Yusha
Palau is one of just 17 countries that has refused to give up diplomatic relations with Taiwan and switch allegiance to China.
Palau, which was under US administration until its independence in 1994, struck up diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1999 after a few years of what Kesolei calls “wooing” from both Taipei and Beijing.
The almost 20-year friendship has been strong, with Kesolei saying “every Palauan has a story” of interaction with Taiwan, whether traveling there for a holiday, education or medical treatment.
However, Taiwan’s allies are slowly being chipped away, as China puts the pressure on and seeks to penalize those that recognize self-ruled Taiwan, which Beijing considers a Chinese territory.
El Salvador switched its allegiance last month, and Burkina Faso and the Dominican Republic severed ties with Taiwan earlier this year.
Those countries that continue to recognize Taiwan — particularly the six in the Pacific, where China is seeking to increase its influence — are feeling the pressure.
For tiny Palau, where tourism accounts for 42.3 percent of GDP, this pressure has come in the form of what the locals call the “China ban.”
In November last year, the Chinese government ordered tour operators to stop selling package tours to Palau, with reports that doing so could lead to fines.
Some insist that Palau has always been a blacklisted destination, but that until recently the Chinese government turned a blind eye.
Evan Rees, Asia-Pacific analyst at Stratfor, says China uses such bans — as well as the granting and withholding of Approved Destination Status (ADS) to countries — as “part of a larger toolkit for compelling behavior.”
Last year, South Korea was the subject of such a travel ban, after a row over its deployment of a US missile defense system, which had a devastating impact on tourism to the country during the PyeongChang Winter Olympics.
The bans affect package tours booked through travel agencies, which accounts for about 45 percent of all Chinese tourists, said Rees, although independent Chinese travelers are still able to visit “banned” destinations.
One Palauan-based Chinese businessman said the word “Palau” had also been blocked as an Internet search term in China.
The impact of the ban on Palau has been stark.
The number of tourists from China has plummeted so dramatically that one airline flying charter flights between China and Palau stopped flights at the end of last month, because “the Chinese government made Palau an illegal tour destination possibly and most likely due to lack of diplomatic status.”
Palauan tour operators and government officials bridle at suggestions the ban has brought Palau to its knees — there were still 9,000 visitor arrivals in July — but occupancy rates at hotels have dropped and businesses are hurting.
The pain of the ban has been particularly acute because it was immediately preceded by a staggering boom in tourism from China, with tourist arrivals from the country skyrocketing from 634 in 2008 — making up less than 1 percent of all visitors — to more than 91,000 in 2015 — 54 percent of all visitors.
At Elilai restuarant, which is heavily promoted as the “best restaurant in Palau” on billboards all over the island, I am the sole diner in a restaurant that could comfortably accommodate 50.
Waitress Donita Rose Cagaoan-Tipay is apologetic about the empty room, saying it was the result of a “ban from China,” although she says she does not know much more about it than that.
“I asked my friend who is a Chinese tour guide. He said Palau and China, the governments are having a fight,” she explains.
The empty restaurants are a far cry from 2014 and 2015, when charter flights from China began landing every day each carrying hundreds of tourists.
Leilani Reklai says the impact on the island was overwhelming.
“Guys were running around town buying land, getting cash in suitcases and buying everything in sight,” says Reklai, who is the president of Palau’s tourism association.
Reklai owned two boats that took tour groups to the Rock Islands, the most famous of Palau’s tourist attractions, which before the Chinese boom would go out four days a week during peak season.
“For almost one year my guys were going out seven days a week,” she says.
“Some people were saying: ‘This is the Chinese strategy, this is what they do, they are going to pour a lot of money in here, and get you addicted like it’s Coke and then turn off the faucet.’ But of course, money was louder so people weren’t listening,” Reklai says.
At 70, Francis Toribiong has had almost every job in the tourism business.
He says the dip hurt “everybody.”
Toribiong has been forced to sell a 25-bed hostel, but says he got off relatively lightly.
“There are so many young men who went to the development bank and borrowed hundreds of thousands of dollars to buy boats,” he says.
Now, demand has dropped so much that they are lucky if they are able to make enough to cover fuel and the loan repayments.
Despite the pain, most people agree the boom was unsustainable. At its peak in 2015, 169,000 tourists arrived in Palau and the country’s power, water and sewage systems struggled to cope. There was huge inflation, and the price of food and rent skyrocketed.
“There was an outcry,” says Ngiraibelas Tmetuchl, chairman of the Palau Visitors Authority, the government’s tourism marketing arm. “Prices of crabs went up, prices of fish, rents went up, people were displaced. There was an apartment that was going for $500, now they charge $1,200. There was a shortage of rooms. Apartments [were converted] from apartments to hotels.”
Kevin Mesebeluu, director of the bureau of tourism, says the China ban might be “a blessing in disguise,” giving Palau a chance to re-evaluate its approach to tourism.
“The president has been very clear about the direction,” he said. “High-value, low-impact sustainable tourism.”
Indeed, the country was heading down this path before the ban came into effect.
In 2015, Palauan President Tommy Remengesau announced a reduction in the number of charter flights between China and Palau in response to environmental and social concerns.
Reklani thinks this decision, which came into effect gradually, meant Palau escaped much more serious financial trouble.
“We definitely got out in time, this pain we’re going through, it would have been so much worse,” she says.
Since the China ban, Remengesau has reiterated his commitment to Taiwan, telling the Nikkei Asian Review that while China was an “important partner,” Palau had “more in common with Taiwan.”
A statement from his spokesperson was even more defiant, suggesting Palau would not bow to pressure.
“Palau is a country of laws, it is a democracy and we make our own decisions,” the spokesperson said.
However, there are others who would not mind seeing Palau switch diplomatic horses.
“It’s about time that we focus our interests and views towards the People’s Republic of China,” Palauan Senate President Hokkons Baules said in July at the groundbreaking ceremony for a Chinese-backed resort, the Island Times reported.
The Taiwan-China question is expected to be a key issue at the next presidential election in 2020.
However, Taiwanese Ambassador to Palau Wallace Chow (周民淦) is not worried about the relationship, saying it is “very solid.”
Speaking to the Guardian during an event for 25 Taiwanese youth ambassadors who are spending several days in Palau as part of a “soft power” mission, Chow says it is this “down-to-Earth, to the people, for the people” approach that will keep Palau onside.
However, Palauans might also be persuaded by the more than US$10 million in aid provided by Taiwan to the country each year, reminders of which are dotted around the island as signs announce that road or building projects are funded by Taiwanese grant money.
“I’m very confident that the Palauan people know who is their true partner and which side their bread is buttered,” Chow said.
Under the slowly moving fans, Kesolei says he does not expect a diplomatic switch any time soon.
“It’s part of our culture that we are very loyal to our friends,” he says.
Palauans also like the image of themselves as a country that is standing up to a superpower.
“Some of my social circle enjoy this limelight. Palau against China!” he says. “This tiny thing against the world’s biggest [country]! Some of my friends say: ‘If we have the power to decide, let’s be the last man standing with Taiwan, [other] countries will think we don’t just switch, we stay with our friends until the very end.’”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers