Japan’s population is shrinking. There are about 127 million people in the country today, but by the year 2050 the figure is projected to drop to about 102 million and keep falling thereafter.
This is likely to cause all sorts of problems.
A shrinking population is also an aging one — a smaller base of workers supporting a larger number of retirees means lower living standards for everyone. An older population also tends to be less productive.
Additionally, a shrinking population means a shrinking domestic market, decreasing the incentive for companies to invest in the country.
It could also reduce the natural rate of interest, forcing the Bank of Japan to keep quantitative easing running forever in order to keep the country out of a liquidity trap, and is certain to reduce Japan’s power and importance in the world.
So there are many reasons to want to stabilize the Japanese population. There are two ways to do this: immigration and higher fertility.
Under Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, Japan has been admitting a lot more immigrants, but while this should help cushion the blow of population decline, it is unlikely to solve it, for several reasons.
First, the sheer numbers required to prevent a decrease in population would be enormous — Japan is not accustomed to being a nation of immigrants, as the US or Canada is, and tens of millions of newcomers would likely provoke a dangerous political backlash.
Second, relatively low salaries and the language barrier mean that Japan has lots of trouble attracting highly skilled permanent residents, meaning that too much of its immigration is of the low-skilled, guest worker variety.
So a rise in fertility would be a very good thing for Japan. The rate has risen from a low of 1.26 children per woman in 2005 to 1.46 in 2015, but that is still well below the 2.1 required for long-term population stability.
The bad news is that birthrates are very hard to raise with government policy.
Almost all rich countries have sub-replacement fertility. The most successful country has probably been France, which has promoted work-life balance and provided generous subsidies for childcare.
Japan is now seeking to emulate that model, providing more cheap childcare and trying to push companies to give employees more time at home.
Those are good ideas, but it is unlikely that they will be enough to stabilize the population. Fortunately, Japan is in a highly innovative mood in terms of policy.
Although many rich countries turn inward and retreat into either nostalgic populism or reflexive conservatism, Japan has experimented with unconventional monetary policy, increased immigration, new corporate governance strategies and other bold moves.
That means it might be the perfect place to try out new ideas for increasing the fertility rate — ideas that, if successful, could be exported to all the other developed nations that are in a similar boat.
One idea would be to promote suburban living. More than 94 percent of Japan’s population lives in cities, and that number has actually risen in recent years. Although home sizes have been increasing, urban apartments and houses still tend to be small places, unsuitable for larger families. That might be one reason the fertility rate tends to be higher in suburbia.
Japan, with its excellent rail networks and flexible zoning laws, is great at density, but it might be time to reconsider the all-urban focus. Cheaper roads and gasoline would help make car-centric suburban life more feasible.
Japan could also leverage its large population of old people, as well as teenagers, to provide cheap accessible childcare.
Many able-bodied retirees might enjoy turning their homes into small daycare centers to inject some energy into their days, and teenagers could be certified to become babysitters — something that is still rare in Japan.
A third idea is to encourage young people to live in communal housing, in order to facilitate social activity and marriage. In Japan, most people still want to get married before having kids, but the anomie and isolation of urban life can prevent them from finding spouses.
Communal living is becoming slightly more popular among the country’s youth, as noted in the reality TV show Terrace House. However, government encouragement could accelerate the trend.
A final strategy would be to leverage popular culture. There is good evidence that Brazilian soap operas depicting small families had the effect of reducing the fertility rate in that country. Japan’s government might prevail upon its producers of television, comics and other media to depict larger families living in typical modern Japanese settings, as a way of spreading higher fertility norms.
These ideas are all fairly speculative, but when nothing works, it is time to try something bold and unconventional.
With its highly effective government and its newfound tolerance for out-of-the-box thinking, Japan is perfectly positioned to be a laboratory for approaches toward stabilizing populations in rich countries.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US