In 1953, when I registered as a frosh in the Faculty of Engineering at McGill University, I had to take a large number of required courses, plus a course on English as a second language (ESL) because I was not born in an English-speaking country.
That left only one course I could choose myself that had to be in the arts or sciences. I chose French 100, because it was one of the two first-year courses that fit into my schedule. I also asked to be exempted from ESL courses since my grades from the provincial high-school leaving examination were well above average.
The request was denied. I had to take ESL at the same time that I took English 100. My request for French was also denied: My high-school leaving exam grades were so high that I would learn nothing in the course.
I then applied to take French 101, but that was also denied, because I had not taken French 100. I ended up taking Invertebrate Biology, the only course available to me.
I think that gives me some qualification to comment on the article “Students protest language aptitude test requirement” (Sept. 8, page 3). I can add to my qualifications my having spent 10 years teaching courses in English at a number of universities in Taiwan.
“It is illogical to impose a rule that students may not attend remedial courses unless they have failed an exam” might be a valid complaint if prerequisites are considered. If students are required to take courses taught in English — as they are at many universities, especially at the graduate level — then some proficiency in English is needed.
Why should students not be allowed to take a remedial course in English if they so desire?
One argument against that would be that if “zero-credit courses” are abolished, lazy students could malinger on the exam to be allowed to add many courses about subjects in which they are already proficient to avoid learning and, in the process, over-burdening the faculty.
A similar case arises in science courses that require a basic knowledge of mathematics. If students are not allowed to take remedial courses that will teach them this basic knowledge, then students will pressure the instructor to dumb down the course, with the threat that if they do not do so, the teaching evaluations will be bad and the instructor will have to find another job. The result is a flimsy education.
I have been exposed to many students who, when asked a question, reply: “I don’t understand” or “I don’t know” in Chinese, but when I ask whether they did not understand the question, did not understand the English or did not understand the subject matter, they are at a loss and repeat the same refrain, even if I ask another student to translate my questions into Chinese. Without a coherent answer, it is difficult to find a way to help the student learn.
I have also been in the position of being assigned to teach the second half of a course after someone else has taught the first half. It took more than two lectures before a student said that the first half had been taught in Chinese, so she was at a complete loss because she did not understand the technical words in English.
Again, not a good way to provide a good education for the money that is being collected.
I was exempted from English 100 before the end of the first trimester and when I told my teacher that the department was still adamant that I should continue the ESL course (“rules are rules,” after all) she fought successfully to relieve me of the obligation.
In invertebrate biology, I learned a good deal about the life cycle of parasites that I was able to use in my consulting work, so I never regretted taking the course. As for French, I was able to continue to improve my skills by reading and speaking the language when the opportunity arose.
Giving universities autonomy “so they could be able to offer a better education” sounds noble, but in practice it will not work unless everyone agree on what “a better education” means.
Too many universities, in Taiwan and the US, seem to think that giving a diploma in four years is the best measure of a good education. In those cases, a diploma is not even evidence of good memorization skills.
There might be other universities that put more stock in actual learning, but as some of my colleagues have said: “That is not fair to the students.”
Without a firm consensus on what constitutes a good education, providing “autonomy” is no more than providing a license to teaching institutions to get money out of students (or their parents) while providing little more than babysitting services.
Emilio Venezian is a former visiting professor at Feng Chia University.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past