Heavy rainfall has brought widespread flooding to southern Taiwan, where city and county governments blame the Central Weather Bureau for making inaccurate forecasts and not warning local authorities early enough.
The Tainan City Government has said it would need NT$65 billion (US$2.1 billion) more over 30 years to complete its flood control and prevention plans. This is not the right attitude.
Politicians brag about their political achievements in terms of “solving” or “eradicating” floods, but hydrologists know that floods can never be eliminated.
There are plans to invest several hundred billion New Taiwan dollars in everything from flood control plans in flood-prone areas and integrated flood management within drainage basins to the creation of water environments as part of the Forward-looking Infrastructure Development Program.
However, this investment can only alleviate ponding and flooding in certain areas, and reduce the damage and losses caused by disastrous floods, because the design standards and degree of protection of every water control project are limited. Even countries with the most advanced flood prevention technology can never be completely free of floods.
The government must still accept the blame and shoulder its responsibilities, but no one should harbor the illusion that anyone can guarantee safety forever.
Experts suggest mitigating floods by means of “sponge cities.” A few years ago, flood detention basins were popular in flood prevention; more recently, the trend has been the use of “intelligent rivers” to provide early warnings and prevent disasters.
Every method is right and effective in its own way, but even a multipronged approach using multiple methods has limits.
When a “sponge city” has absorbed as much water as it can, the excess water that it cannot absorb could cause a disaster. Flood detention basins are effective, but how big can they be and how much rainwater can they hold? If they overflow, it would cause ponding and flooding in nearby areas. Intelligent river management can provide early warnings, but that would not necessarily eliminate deaths, injuries and property damage.
Science and technology are limited, rendering weather forecasting a difficult task, but even more advanced technology and more accurate forecasts would not solve all the problems.
Standards for urban drainage in some localities only call for a five or 10-year return period, meaning that floods can be expected to recur every 10 years on average. It is useless to authorize pumps to deal with torrential rainfall if all the nearby waterways are overflowing and there is no place to pump the water.
Hoping that disastrous floods will never happen is wishful thinking. Even if the government were to spend huge sums of money to expropriate land and demolish buildings, with no concern for public opinion, and enlarge flood channels, the effect would be limited.
Perhaps the return period should be lengthened to 50 or 100 years. Even Taipei, with a return period of 200 years, had widespread flooding when Typhoon Nari struck in September 2001.
Countries with the most advanced flood prevention, such as the US and Japan, have also experienced disastrous floods in the past few years.
Climate change is causing ever-greater extremes of drought and flooding, and existing standards might not match real conditions.
Forecast technology must be improved and links between central and local authorities strengthened, but the public must also be educated about disaster prevention. Disasters can only be mitigated, not eliminated.
Local governments should not seize resources with a pledge to “solve” or “eliminate” floods. Any such promises are empty — they only give the public beautiful, but sadly unrealistic dreams.
Chang Yen-ming is a retired water resources officer.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers