The completion of one of the world’s longest bridges stands as the biggest monument to China’s success in reuniting its colonial-era concessions. Overcoming the political divide might prove much more difficult.
The 55km span — eerily deserted as crews prepared for a ribbon-cutting ceremony expected later this year — connects the former European outposts of Hong Kong and Macau for the first time and ties them both to southern China. It is tipped to carry some 29,000 cars and trucks daily over blue tropical waters formerly patrolled by three navies, and across borders the People’s Liberation Army once guarded mostly to keep defectors from leaving.
The US$15 billion bridge is only one piece of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) sweeping plan to knit the region into a high-tech megalopolis to rival Silicon Valley in California. This so-called Greater Bay Area — with 67 million residents — would boast a US$1 trillion economy and eclipse Japan as the world’s fourth-largest exporter, according to HSBC Holdings.
Illustration: Yusha
While the project envisions a better marriage between China’s industrial might, Hong Kong’s capital markets and Macau’s casinos, it also risks aggravating rising tensions over Beijing’s influence on the reclaimed colonies.
Hong Kong in particular is confronting difficult questions about whether it can profit from China’s rise while still maintaining the “high degree of autonomy” promised before its return from Britain.
“Hong Kong needs to diversify — it could be a San Francisco and much more to the Bay Area’s Silicon Valley,” said Albert Wong (黃克強), chief executive officer of Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks, a public corporation set up by the Hong Kong Government that runs start-up incubators. “Hong Kong can’t afford to miss this boat.”
The Greater Bay Area could serve as a new growth engine for Hong Kong, Macau and Shenzhen, the economic powerhouse one of Xi’s predecessors, Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), built on their doorstep almost four decades ago.
To make it work, China must figure out a way to move people and capital more efficiently between its one-party state and the liberal, capitalist bastions of Hong Kong and Macau — with their own passports, currencies, trade policies, courts and civil rights.
Success could help quiet a persistent source of angst toward the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and provide a launching point for China’s Belt and Road Initiative to integrate trade and infrastructure networks across Africa, Asia and Europe. Failure risks undermining an economic system credited with making Hong Kong a top financial center and former Portuguese possession Macau the world’s biggest gaming hub.
The challenge facing Xi was clear during the three-year debate over China’s US$11 billion project to connect Hong Kong to its prized high-speed rail network via Shenzhen, where Internet giant Tencent Holdings and smartphone maker Huawei Technologies are based. To make the commute more appealing, authorities sought to station the Chinese border crossing at a futuristic new rail terminus overlooking Hong Kong’s Victoria Harbor.
The plan faced resistance from democracy advocates, who argued it would undermine a constitutional ban on Chinese law enforcement officers operating in the territory. Hong Kong finally passed the necessary legislation in June, but only after China’s National People’s Congress stepped in to ratify the plan and six opposition lawmakers were purged from the local council for a variety of violations.
The first bullet trains are expected to start arriving under the rail terminal’s 4,000 glass panels next month.
“This will be the fastest border crossing with China,” said Francis Li (李聖基), operating chief for MTR, which runs the project.
The debate highlights a divide between Hong Kong’s Beijing-backed government and its citizens, who routinely give about 60 percent of their votes to opposition candidates in local legislative elections. Many of the territory’s Cantonese-speaking residents — particularly its youth — see little appeal in education and employment in Mandarin-speaking China and are suspicious of the CCP’s intentions.
“It’s the old communist tactic of using economic policy to impose political control,” said Sonny Lo (盧兆興), a University of Hong Kong political science professor who has authored books on Chinese police practices and the territory’s relationship with Beijing.
Concerns have only intensified since Xi took power in 2012 and began tightening China’s already stringent curbs on dissent. The Hong Kong Government’s refusal to grant democracy concessions after mass protests in 2014, convinced some participants to found pro-independence parties — and authorities to launch unprecedented efforts to ban them.
“The bridge, the rail link — so far the Beijing and Hong Kong governments are focusing on the hardware,” said Alvin Yeung (楊岳橋), a lawmaker and leader of the opposition Civic Party. “But the ‘software’ which makes Hong Kong unique matters more — the free rule of law, the free flow of capital, which are lacking across the border.”
Such concerns seem more abstract while riding the moving sidewalk across the Sham Chun River and watching the fields and swamps of Hong Kong’s northern frontier give way to the skyscrapers of Shenzhen. It was there in 1979 that Deng approved what would be his first special economic zone, reversing the flight of people and money from a chaotic and impoverished China.
Implemented by Xi’s father, then-Guangdong Governor Xi Zhongxun (習仲勳), the zone lifted many limits on cross-border trade and foreign investment. Shenzhen swelled with Hong Kong cash and Chinese workers, growing from a fishing village of about 30,000 people into a high-tech metropolis of 13 million.
Entrepreneurs who have grown accustomed to operating on both sides of the border have said that concerns about Beijing’s political intentions are overblown.
Horace Zheng (鄭昊), 38, vice president at start-up Youibot Robotics, said he wants the Greater Bay Area to “take off” so that he can market his vehicle-inspection robot across the region.
“What should I be concerned about?” said Duncan Turner, 39, the British managing director of HAX, an accelerator for hardware start-ups that is located eight floors above a sprawling electronics market in Shenzhen. “People in Hong Kong need to open up to the Bay Area so that they can host the Asian headquarters for tech companies, with factories in China.”
The shift has put Hong Kong’s traditional role as gateway to the world’s most populous country under pressure. The local economy is equivalent to less than 3 percent of China’s GDP, compared with 18 percent in 1997. Hong Kong’s port is only the world’s sixth-busiest container port, lagging behind Chinese hubs such as Shanghai and Shenzhen.
Macau has felt similar pressure from China, as rich Chinese have poured into the territory’s casinos and Beijing has followed with crack downs on money laundering and capital flight.
Still, convincing more Hong Kong people to pursue careers in China would require more than a multibillion-dollar bridge and railway projects. The State Council, China’s Cabinet, earlier this week announced that residents of Hong Kong and Macau, as well as those from Taiwan, would receive new identification cards allowing them greater access to social and public services in China.
Another major barrier is a maximum tax rate of 45 percent — more than twice the level in Hong Kong. That is why some Greater Bay Area advocates, such as Legislative Councillor Holden Chow (周浩鼎), are seeking accelerated efforts to close such policy gaps.
“It’s not about Beijing swallowing up Hong Kong — that’s just scaremongering,” said Chow, vice chairman of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong, the largest Beijing-loyalist party in the territory. “Hong Kong needs economic integration with China, and it needs support from the central government.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers