In the not too distant future, China’s population will start to shrink. This will be an unprecedented demographic change in Chinese history in the absence of epidemics, famine or conflict. Eventually, China will lose its position to India as the most populous country in the world, something that the UN predicts will happen near the middle of the next decade.
This decline in population comes with social and economic challenges. When a population declines, the number of workers, as well as their output, might drop. This has led to some alarming predictions about China’s future growth potential.
However, it is not all doom and gloom. Far from it. High standards of living are attainable, despite significant population aging. This is not always widely acknowledged.
There are two common misconceptions surrounding China’s demographic transition — one regarding changes in household spending and a second regarding preparations for life in retirement.
To understand the first issue — household dynamics and consumption — consider China’s small household size and high female labor participation rates. The average Chinese household consists of about three people, compared with India’s four-to-five. This is the result of China’s now abandoned one-child policy and continued low birth rates.
Then there is the participation of women in employment.
Mao Zedong (毛澤東) once famously declared that women “hold up half the sky.”
In the 1970s, reforms were introduced to integrate women into the labor force by promoting education and employment opportunities. As a result, many Chinese women are employed and contribute to household income.
Thus, in the average Chinese household, more people earn an income, while there are fewer “mouths to feed” compared to, say, an average Indian household.
As they age, many Chinese parents now see their sons or daughters leave home and start making a life on their own. They become “empty-nesters,” and many of them are in a comfortable financial position. Their mortgage is often paid off and there is already a nice car to impress the neighbors.
About 47 million Chinese live in homes with an income exceeding US$50,000 per year. The number of these households is likely to grow and equal that of the US in the next two decades, reaching an estimated 222 million in 2038. People aged 40 to 64 account for about 40 percent of this high-income bracket.
This means that incremental consumption in China is increasingly driven by these older, affluent “empty-nesters.” They are moving from acquiring possessions to spending on experiences. Clustered in wealthy, aspirational eastern China, they are on the lookout for better homes, healthier lifestyles and a ticket to see the world.
Eventually, these older Chinese will retire. To some, this is a worry, given the absence of a well-funded pension system. Already, in parts of Asia, the absence of such a system is causing people to work longer and change their savings behavior.
South Korean and Japanese men face this reality and tend to work the longest — nearly 30 percent of South Koreans aged more than 65 are still employed.
To ensure continued consumption after the official retirement age, many will accumulate savings and build capital. This will be used to make investments in the domestic economy, allowing for economic growth. Think of pension funds investing in companies, buying bonds, issuing mortgages or buying commercial real estate. As a consequence, per capita income will grow faster.
This “capital deepening” is already unfolding in Japan, Korea and Taiwan, and there are signs that mainland China will follow. Governments should support this trend with policies that encourage the accumulation of assets.
Thus, China’s demographic story is often misunderstood. This is not to say that the decline in population is without challenges, but there are also opportunities.
The emergence of a Chinese version of “dual-income, no kids” households will dramatically alter some of the dynamics in consumer markets.
Meanwhile, “capital deepening” should provide a boost to economic growth that offsets the primary effects associated with aging — fewer younger people taking care of a growing group of older people.
Aging does not have to be a precursor of pending doom. Indeed, it is more likely that aging can support growth.
With the right policies in place, it might well turn out in China that “old is gold.”
Herald van der Linde is head of Asia equity strategy at HSBC Global Research in Hong Kong.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers