Kim Jeong-cheol wakes up every morning at 6am to deliver packages to Seoul’s wealthier residents and spends every night ferrying those same people home after a night out, ending his working day well past midnight. He also works at a cosmetics distribution company he runs from his home with his wife.
Kim is one of many in South Korea’s capital to have taken on extra jobs as part of the unintended consequence of a law aimed at capping working hours and giving people more free time.
On July 1, South Korea cut the maximum weekly work hours to 52, down from 68.
Illustration: Mountain People
However, the new regulation intended to combat long hours in Seoul’s steel and glass office towers has backfired for many doing manual or irregular labor, with people flocking to poorly regulated industries and facing pay cuts.
Kim added his delivery job — for South Korea’s national postal service — after the new law meant more office workers went home early, reducing the number of driving jobs at night.
Kim, who has three daughters to support through university, now works about 19 hours per day.
“We used to be a happy family, I spent a lot of time with my daughters and when I had some free time I read the Bible,” the 59-year-old said. “Lawmakers are just passing new laws, which only benefit the powerful and wealthy.”
Kim, whose income dropped 40 percent after the law went into effect, is not alone.
A woman who would give only her surname, Park, began working in a convenience store after she lost about 500,000 won (US$442) per month due to the cap on working hours.
A builder named Seo took a second job working as a type of unofficial bus service when hours were cut to comply with the law.
The South Korean National Assembly estimated that 150,000 workers would face an average pay cut of 410,000 won per month when the law was passed due to working less overtime.
About one-third of South Korea’s labor force work in jobs with irregular hours, such as construction, driving, cleaning or as convenience store clerks, government statistics showed.
In the 1960s, the nation’s economy expanded rapidly, turning a country still reeling from the 1950-1953 Korean War into the 12th-largest economy in a generation. It has produced national champions like Samsung, Hyundai and LG, massive conglomerates that wield significant political influence, but that achievement has come at the expense of leisure time.
South Korean workers have some of the longest working weeks among members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, behind only Mexico. Last year, the average person worked 2,024 hours, or about 38.9 hours per week.
The group of mostly developed economies does not include countries such as China and India, and developing countries tend to work more.
This grueling work environment has been blamed for a host of societal problems, from a low birth rate to plummeting productivity.
South Korean Minister of Gender Equality and Family Chung Hyun-back has called working hours “inhumanely long” and said they have contributed to the South’s rapidly aging society.
However, South Koreans still work about 340 more hours per year compared with workers in the UK and Australia — about nine additional standard work weeks — despite having relatively similar average incomes. They work about six additional weeks compared with counterparts in the US.
There is a strong case for tackling the culture of long hours. Working more than 50 hours per week causes a drop in productivity, according to researchers at Stanford University, and there was little different in output for employees who worked between 56 and 70 hours.
Despite the hardships faced by workers paid by the hour, office workers have rejoiced at the new law.
Some have long complained of a culture that expected employees to stay late, despite a lack of work.
Others have said bosses would routinely assign extra tasks outside normal hours, leading many employees to procrastinate all day, as they knew they had to stay late regardless of workload.
Seoul City Hall cuts electricity to the building at 7pm on Fridays and some private companies broadcast reminders throughout the week telling people to go home earlier.
Retailers and bakeries have reduced opening times by an hour and more aggressive tactics include closed-circuit TV cameras monitoring offices for stragglers and limiting hours when employees can use swipe card systems.
Employers who break the law face up to two years in prison and hefty fines.
“It’s very difficult to tell your boss or other people above you that you’re going home earlier than them when they’re still in the office. I even had to tell them that I was sorry to leave if I had plans,” said 27-year-old Jay Jung, who works in hospital management.
Beforehand, he typically did at least two to three hours of overtime per day.
“The so-called ‘life with evenings’ is possible now, because we can go home on time,” he added.
However, working-class people have largely mocked the new law for forcing them to take second or third jobs, saying: “Instead of a life with dinner, there’s a new life where you have to skip dinner.”
About 20,000 people have flocked to become on-demand drivers since the new law passed, Korean Association of Relief Drivers head Kim Jong-yong said.
Firms have lowered fares amid the influx of new workers, and Kim Jong-yong said he has been blocked by the largest app after advocating for workers rights.
All the fanfare about the cap on working hours has left him wondering: “Where are the legal protections for us?”
“The 52-hour law was meant to benefit all workers, however it’s only positively affecting people working in stable, high-paying jobs such as civil servants and people working in corporate companies,” Kim Jong-yong said.
“Taking a second job is the only thing keeping these people off the streets, it’s a last resort,” he said. “Their struggles are a reflection of how Korean society treats and values working-class people.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past