Singaporean Minister of Foreign Affairs Vivian Balakrishnan on Thursday last week said that ASEAN and China had agreed on a single draft text to form the basis for negotiations for a code of conduct in the South China Sea and on the “key modalities” for future negotiations, an announcement that was hailed as a major milestone in a years-long effort.
The congratulations might have been premature, not least because details of the text and the modalities have not been fully disclosed, but also because it seems that no one is expecting a deal any time soon.
While Balakrishnan was unwilling to talk about a possible timetable, citing the sensitivity of the negotiations, Yi Xianliang (易先良), director-general of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ Department of Boundary and Ocean Affairs, this week said that talk of a timetable was unrealistic.
In an interview with China Newsweek magazine on Thursday, Yi blamed “outsiders” for not only pushing for a timetable, but for such a code of conduct deal to be legally binding.
However, it is not just “outsiders” who want a legally binding and enforceable code for the South China Sea; that has been the goal for those ASEAN members who also claim sovereign rights to portions of the sea: Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei.
Any such ASEAN-China deal is of course of crucial importance to Taiwan, which has its own territorial claims that rival those of China and the others, but is locked out of negotiations by the alliance’s diplomatic recognition of Beijing.
The problem with waiting for years for a code-of-conduct pact to be reached is that Beijing is aggressively pushing its military and commercial interests, as its land-reclamation efforts to create seven artificial islands demonstrate. Those islands are now equipped with runways, communications and other military facilities.
In addition, as of May, China began allowing visa-free travel for citizens of almost 60 nations to Hainan Province, whose Sansha City on Woody Island (Yongxing Island, 永興島) administers Beijing’s claimed territory in the disputed Paracel Islands (Xisha Islands, 西沙群島), as well as the Spratly Islands (Nansha Islands, 南沙群島) and several other reefs and shoals, potentially paving the way for foreigners to join Chinese on cruises from Hainan to the Paracels, which were introduced in 2013.
An expansion of airport facilities on Woody Island has led to more commercial flights, with nearly 700 landing there last year, according to wire reports.
Paying attention to China’s commercial efforts, as well as its military activities, on the disputed islands is crucial, because under its proposals for the eventual code of conduct mentioned in the single text document is one that marine cooperation should be carried out just by ASEAN members and China, and “shall not be conducted in cooperation with companies from countries outside the region.”
Given that much of the enmity over the rival claims to the South China Sea comes from its potential oil, gas and mineral resources, as well as fisheries and other industries, any deal that restricted participation in exploration and development activities would give China’s state-owned enterprises and other corporations a massive advantage.
Malaysia seems cognizant of that risk with its proposal that nothing in the code should affect the abilities of the signatories to “conduct activities with foreign countries or private entities of their own choosing.”
Agreeing on a code of conduct would be a good thing, but ASEAN members should recognize the risks they run by going along with Beijing’s efforts to drag out the negotiations and restrict participation in the region by “outsiders,” as well as its reluctance to make the code legally binding.
Taiwan and all those nations for which the South China Sea is a crucial waterway should continue to press for their views to be heard as well.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers