South Australia Minister for Energy and Mining Dan van Holst Pellekaan said the state is on track to have 75 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2025 — the target set by the state’s former Labor premier, Jay Weatherill, and once rejected by the Liberal government.
Van Holst Pellekaan pledged to ensure it does not come at too high a price.
The Liberal Party was highly critical of Weatherill’s target when it was announced during this year’s South Australian election campaign, with then-state opposition leader Steven Marshall pledging to scrap it and Australian Minister for the Environment and Energy Josh Frydenberg likening Weatherill to a clean energy addicted gambler “doubling down to chase his losses.”
Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull had earlier described Weatherill’s renewable energy policy as “ideology and idiocy in equal measure.”
However, several expert analyses have found the state is likely to meet or nearly meet the aspirational target, which was not tied to a policy mechanism.
The Australian Energy Market Operator has projected South Australia would have 73 percent renewable power by 2020-2021, while consultants Green Energy Markets found it could reach 74 percent by 2025 without any additional policies being introduced.
Van Holst Pellekaan said that was also his understanding.
“That’s what the reports I’ve read are saying,” he said. “We need to harness it properly so consumers aren’t paying too high a price along the way.”
Van Holst Pellekaan has responsibility for shaping the future of energy in a state that already gets about half its electricity from variable sources, such as wind and solar, a situation that Weatherill described in 2015 as “a big international experiment.”
The new minister has inherited some of Labor’s proposed solutions, including a giant lithium-ion battery, a 20-year power purchase contract to underwrite a solar thermal plant with built-in storage and a “virtual power plant” of solar and batteries across public housing sites.
He assumed the energy portfolio in March amid intense debate over the future of the national electricity market, which connects the four eastern states and South Australia.
Frydenberg is attempting to design the government’s national energy guarantee policy so that it can win backing from the states, the Coalition party room and federal parliament.
Labor wants it to allow a future government to ramp up the proposed 2030 emissions target for the electricity grid of a 26 percent cut below 2005 levels. Some federal Coalition members want taxpayers to support or underwrite new or existing coal-fired power plants.
Speaking in his electorate office in Port Augusta, home to the state’s coal power until the last plant closed in 2016, and now with up to 13 clean energy at varying stages of development, including the solar thermal project, Van Holst Pellekaan said the shift from coal to more clean energy had been messier than it needed to be, but was inevitable.
“We must transition away from fossil fuels towards renewable energy,” he said. “There’s no doubt about it, and we need to do it sensibly.”
He said he believed the former Labor government had made a mistake in not paying Alinta Energy the US$24 million it had requested to keep the Northern coal plant at Port Augusta open for another three years while more renewable energy was built, as it would have avoided “an enormous amount of pain” in local job losses and a spike in the wholesale electricity price.
“Many of my friends who are incredibly strong proponents of renewable energy disagree with me,” he said. “They say: ‘No mate, just shut it as soon as possible. Who cares what the price is?’ The ‘Who cares what the price is?’ part is where I differ.”
“For us, I think a three-year phase-in [of replacing coal] would have been fine. Nationally, maybe we’re looking at a 10 or-20-year phase-in. I’m comfortable there’s no more coal-fired electricity in South Australia — very comfortable — we just should have made the transition better,” he said.
Van Holst Pellekaan said gas-fired electricity, a fossil fuel with lower emissions than coal, would have a slower decline, predicting it would take “a couple of decades.”
Rather than traditional baseload gas that runs constantly, he said the focus would be on peaking gas plants — fast-start generators that sit idle until needed at times of peak demand — to fill the gaps around renewable energy.
He agreed with the federal government that policy should be “broadly technologically neutral,” but said it needed to place a value on three goals — keeping consumer costs down, delivering non-polluting technology and improved efficiency within the national market.
“That steers you towards large-scale renewables with large-scale storage and an underlying security that comes from peaking gas plants,” he said.
South Australia is also backing small-scale storage. Under a deal signed by Labor, the government is installing a “virtual power plant” — initially 1,100 solar panels and Tesla batteries in public housing backed by a US$30 million loan from taxpayers.
Van Holst Pellekaan last week announced that an initial trial had been a success, increasing supply and the reliability of the network and lowering cost at times of peak demand.
He said that delivering Labor’s full promise of 50,000 public housing systems depended on private-sector financing and Tesla and the government signing off on the final program design.
The Labor scheme will sit alongside a Liberal-pledged US$100 million plan to subsidize batteries at 40,000 private homes. Details are promised in coming months.
Van Holst Pellekaan said his focus in energy was helping consumers, including by making tools available to help those who chose to juggle their electricity use to reduce their bills.
“If a family says: ‘I don’t care if it’s the most expensive electricity of the day, I’m going to use it between 5pm and 9pm because that’s what I want in my household,’ OK, that’s their choice,” he said. “But if another family says: ‘I can skew things a bit earlier, or a bit later, and I can get a bit cheaper electricity,’ good, that’s their choice.”
He stressed the importance of improved connection between the states, particularly a long-mooted link between South Australia and New South Wales, to improve grid efficiency and reliability.
The transmission company ElectraNet has recommended a US$1.5 billion interconnector between South Australia’s mid-north and Wagga Wagga.
Van Holst Pellekaan, a National Basketball League player in the 1980s with the Hobart Devils, said South Australia’s energy policies were in line with recent advice from the Australia Energy Market Operator and the competition and consumer watchdog.
The former released a forecast that found renewable electricity backed by storage and gas would be the lowest cost replacement for coal, and that early departures from the grid should be avoided to ensure an orderly transition.
The latter made recommendations to reform the national energy market, including potentially underwriting new plants designed to serve large industrial users to ensure they can be funded and built — a proposal energy insiders understand was influenced by South Australian policies.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers