The Taipei Department of Education reportedly plans to install facial recognition systems for campus security and smart roll calls in four public high schools: Taipei First Girls’ High School, Taipei Municipal Heping High School, Taipei Municipal Zhong-Lun High School and Taipei Municipal Bailing High School.
The systems were scheduled to run on a trial basis at the beginning of the fall semester, but the news was met with a public backlash, resulting in Information Technology Education Division Director Chen Ping-hsi (陳秉熙) saying that the systems would be installed, but not switched on.
This brings to mind what happened when people discovered that mobile phones of a certain Chinese brand could automatically switch on the camera. The company responded by saying that the cameras would turn on, but not be used. The question in both cases is: Can you believe them?
In May, media reports said that the Taipei City Government would install “smart lampposts” that incorporated facial recognition systems to monitor traffic and to collect and analyze information about gatherings and parades, drawing similar public criticism.
Critics have pointed out that China is proud of using facial recognition systems to monitor and control the public. China has the world’s biggest database of people’s biological characteristics and is creating an Orwellian state where “Big Brother is watching you.”
Western countries have banned Facebook from using facial recognition to collect information about its users amid fears of possible misuse.
However, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is going against the tide of mainstream opinion. He often praises a more authoritarian kind of democracy and even worships dictatorial historical figures.
Ko is keen on “exchanges” with China. Could it be that the kind of surveillance technology that the Chinese Communist Party uses to erode human rights has crept into “Chinese Taipei” on the back of such “exchanges?”
Ko has said that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are “one family,” but does he really want both legal systems to be “one family” too?
Now his administration wants to test highly controversial facial recognition technology based solely on the education department’s internal plan in collaboration with the system’s supplier. Does this not show a worrying contempt for Taiwan’s democracy and the rule of law?
The Council of Grand Justices’ Constitutional Interpretation No. 585 says that “the right of privacy is ... an indispensable fundamental right ... for purposes of ... preventing invasions of personal privacy and maintaining self-control of personal information,” and that “the people have the right to decide whether or not to disclose their personal information, and, if so, to what extent, at what time, in what manner and to what people such information will be disclosed.”
This interpretation was originally made in connection with a controversy over fingerprinting. Now, facial recognition — another kind of biometric tool — is to be directly applied to students who are not yet adults, despite authorities having no legal mandate to do so.
The Taipei City Government’s motives are dubious, and it is suspicious that it plans to try the technology out on a soft target first. Besides, are the 15,000 surveillance cameras that have already been installed in Taipei not enough?
Facial recognition has implications not just for privacy, but also for national security. Any such system can only work in conjunction with a massive database. By cross-referencing information and processing it with powerful computers, operators can know all about anyone’s everyday activities.
This personal information is irretrievable: Once it has leaked, there is no way of putting it back, so it can have a sizable effect.
Furthermore, the central government has betrayed the public’s expectations on numerous occasions. At one time, it said that the electronic toll collection system on freeways would not be used to catch vehicles going over the speed limit, but today it is used for that purpose.
Ko likes to say that people should trust the government, but the reality is not so simple.
Chen Kuan-fu is a graduate student in National Taipei University’s Department of Law.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS