Taiwanese independence activists made headlines last week by hurling red paint at the statue of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) at the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall in Taipei.
While Chiang is an often-reviled figure whose reign during the White Terror era caused much damage to Taiwanese people and culture, here is the thing that does not make sense: Chiang is long dead, his Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is not even in power. What is really stopping Taiwan from being independent is the Chinese Communist Party (CPP), with its petty tactics and threats to Taiwan’s very existence.
The pro-China contingent in Taiwan is not even looking toward Chiang anymore — their attention is directed toward the CCP and gaining its favor.
Instead of focusing their energy and time on combating Chinese pressure or helping to build a Taiwan strong enough to at least stand up to the real enemy, these pro-independence and pro-China groups are further dividing a Taiwanese society that, despite an emerging Taiwanese identity, is still plagued by ideological and political squabbles that simply do the nation no good.
There is not much point in attacking an already hated dead person — an easy target — and risking jail time just to make the headlines.
The bulk of the Chiang statues in the nation have already been removed and placed in a park where visitors can sit on his head and do whatever they want with them.
It is understandable that Taiwanese also want the memorial hall rededicated, but that would take time and cost a lot of money.
Transitional justice is important, but defacing Chiang statues does nothing toward the purported goal of Taiwanese independence.
If drastic action is what they want, why not target those who are really damaging Taiwan’s sovereignty? The politicians who are willing to sell out Taiwan for Chinese favors, the companies that list Taiwan as part of China on their Web sites, or even the pro-China demonstrators who wave the People’s Republic of China flag in public.
It is exactly this delusion and shortsightedness that led to Taiwan’s situation today.
In the 1970s, as Taiwan was losing its international clout, Chiang refused to do what was best for Taiwan due to his ideological mental block of insisting on being the ruler of both China and Taiwan.
Instead of trying to compete with the CCP as Taiwan or Formosa, which was his best chance of success, he backed out of the UN entirely and now Taiwan cannot get back in.
That decision still bites Taiwan today, and the CCP is now strong enough to pressure major nations and corporations to pretend that Taiwan does not exist as a sovereign nation.
The inability of Taiwanese to unite and stand against China as a whole is largely created by the ideological differences created by Chiang and his cohorts’ misrule.
The best way to stick it to Chiang is to abandon these ideological absurdities that are no longer valid in today’s political climate and move forward together in a constructive way as Taiwanese.
Taiwan is already de facto independent, and its citizens should use that to their advantage to keep improving the nation and combating outside threats so that Taiwan has a chance of eventual international recognition and de jure independence.
Only a stronger, united Taiwan has a chance of competing against Chinese influence and surviving.
The bottom line is that all these ideological battles and campaigns mean nothing if there is no longer a nation left to fight over.
We need to proceed sensibly and intelligently.
Burger King Taiwan on Wednesday last week posted an update on Facebook advertising a new “Wuhan pneumonia” (武漢肺炎) home delivery meal, catering to customers hankering for a Whopper, but who wished to avoid visiting one of its outlets. “Wuhan pneumonia” is the term commonly used in Taiwan to describe COVID-19. Beijing has been waging an extensive propaganda campaign against the use of the words “Wuhan” or “China” in reference to the novel coronavirus, calling it racist and discriminatory. Meanwhile, Chinese officials have claimed that the coronavirus might have originated in the US. The intention is obvious: to distract attention from the Chinese Communist
Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force Shaanxi KJ-500 airborne early-warning aircraft and Shenyang J-11 fighters on March 16 conducted a nighttime exercise in the waters southwest of Taiwan and, in doing so, came close to the nation’s air defense identification zone. Three days later, the PLA Navy’s fleet for Gulf of Aden escort mission sailed north in the Pacific off Taiwan’s east coast via the Miyako Strait on its way home. Meanwhile, the US carried out freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea and assembled the USS Theodore Roosevelt carrier strike group with the Expeditionary Strike Group to conduct
Having returned to the UK late last year and with a Taiwanese spouse remaining in Taiwan, I have been afforded the chance to compare and contrast the UK and Taiwanese governments’ responses to the COVID-19 crisis. My early conclusions are that Taiwan benefits from a rational, competent government, which quickly recognizes, adapts to and confronts large-scale disasters. It is led by a government that does more than just talk of respecting democracy and human rights, one that is scrutinized and responds to criticism, one that is concerned about public opinion, and one that is used to dealing with emergencies on
Italy, Spain, France, the UK and the US are all depending on social distancing to fight COVID-19 and have fallen into terrible situations, with mounting positive cases and many deaths. Social distancing might flatten the curve, so that the peak is not so high that hospitals are overwhelmed with patients, the problem is that the pandemic could extend further into the future, hurt the economy more and become unbearable for society. Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and Singapore have controlled the spread of COVID-19, and the main reason is that most Asians wear masks. It can be illustrated as follows: If someone contracts the