In 1984, I gathered the most successful musicians of the time to form a “supergroup” called Band Aid to raise money for famine relief in Ethiopia. The next year, an even larger grouping was formed for Live Aid, a major benefit concert and music-based fundraising initiative that continues to this day.
At last month’s International Forum on Food and Nutrition, held by the Barilla Foundation, the enduring — and increasingly urgent — need for efforts to strengthen food security could not be more obvious.
The fate of the Easter Islanders illustrates the world’s problem. Some time in the 12th century, a group of Polynesians found their way to a remote volcanic island where dense forests provided food, animals, and the tools and materials to build hundreds of complex and mysterious stone sculptures.
However, little by little, the people destroyed those forests, ultimately committing social, cultural and physical suicide.
Today, in relative terms, we collectively have only a small swath of forest left — and we are rapidly destroying it. We are running out of land to farm and deserts are spreading.
The food we produce is often wasted, while almost 1 billion people do not have enough to eat — a reality that leaves many with little choice except to migrate.
Most media coverage focuses on refugees fleeing armed conflict — think Syria — or migrants seeking better economic opportunities than they have at home — think Nigeria or Pakistan.
However, the link between food scarcity and migration is stronger than it might seem to those who are not among the hungry.
For example, the Arab Spring uprisings of 2010 to 2011, which produced a massive wave of refugees, were triggered by a rise in wheat prices, which led to widespread bread riots that morphed into broader political revolutions.
In fact, many armed conflicts, and the mass displacement they cause, can be traced back to food insecurity.
While the poor south starves, the rich north gorges. More than 2 billion of us are overweight, puffed up by low-energy sugars and mass-produced processed foods rich in fat.
According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN, just one-quarter of the food we throw out or squander each year would be enough to feed 870 million hungry people.
Worldwide, one-third of all crops are wasted. Like the Easter Islanders of the past, we are setting ourselves up for self-annihilation.
Moreover, human-driven climate change threatens to intensify existing pressures affecting food supply and migration.
In a report published in December last year, the European Commission’s European Political Strategy Center predicted that ever more frequent droughts and floods will “dwarf all other drivers of migration,” with as many as 1 billion people displaced globally by 2050.
Even the lowest estimate of 25 million climate-change migrants “would dwarf the current levels of new refugees and internally displaced persons,” the report says.
To be sure, some steps are being taken to address food waste and scarcity.
For example, this year, the European Commission proposed cuts in farm subsidies, which contribute to overproduction.
However, this approach — framed in terms of “evolution,” rather than the “revolution” that is needed — is not even remotely adequate.
The EU’s common agricultural policy has long been highly problematic.
The policy authorized tax money to be spent on growing surplus food, which was then warehoused — at further cost — and ultimately destroyed — at still further cost.
The system has improved somewhat over the years, but not nearly enough.
The farm bill in the US — the US federal government’s primary agricultural and food policy tool — is similarly wasteful.
What is needed is not just a politically tolerable adjustment to existing policies, but rather root-and-branch reform that emphasizes real results.
Unfortunately, it is not clear whether there are any politicians up to the task, whether in the erratic and polarized US or in the ineffectual European Parliament and Commission.
The time to step up was yesterday; the time to adopt a new approach is now.
We can discuss the UN Sustainable Development Goals — which include targets like “halving per capita global food waste at the retail and consumer level and reducing food losses along production and supply chains by 2030” — until we are blue in the face. What matters are well-designed, effective and comprehensive policies, implemented in a sustained manner, and those are nowhere to be found.
The Earth is 45 million centuries old, but our century is unique, because it is the first in which a species could destroy the entire basis of its own existence.
Yet we latter-day Easter Islanders seem unaware of this existential threat, preferring to build statues rather than sustainable systems for survival.
Will we acknowledge our predicament only when our land becomes a desert, when our health systems collapse under the strain, when even the wealthy are facing food shortages, when fresh water becomes scarce and when our national shorelines are breached? By then, it will be too late and our fate will be sealed.
The greatest threat to our planet is the belief that someone else will save it. Each of us must recognize the seriousness of our situation and demand real action to change it. That means you.
Bob Geldof is an Irish singer-songwriter, author and political activist. He is the founder and chairman of the Band Aid Trust for famine relief in Africa and a member of the Africa Progress Panel.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase