New bioplastics are being made in laboratories from straw, wood chips and food waste, with researchers aiming to replace oil as the source of the world’s plastic. The new approaches include genetically modifying bacteria to eat wood and produce useful chemicals.
However, the bioplastics are significantly more expensive to make than fossil fuel-based plastics.
Land and seas around the world, from high mountains to deep oceans, have become polluted with plastic, prompting major public concern. The world has produced 8 billion tonnes of plastic since the 1950s and demand is still rising. While some waste plastic is recycled, much of it is incinerated to produce electricity, resulting in carbon emissions that drive climate change.
Illustration: Mountain People
In contrast to plastic made from oil, plastics made from plant-based materials only release the carbon that the plants absorbed from the air as they grew. Bioplastics will also give more options for products that biodegrade in the environment, although they can be made very long-lasting if required.
“Plastics are an incredible enhancement to our daily lives,” said Paul Mines, CEO of Biome Technologies in the UK, which has spent £5 million over the past five years on bioplastics research.
Plastic is both light and strong, “but we can’t go on using fossil fuel-based materials,” he said. “About 6 to 7 percent of every barrel of oil is used to make plastics.”
Using plant materials is feasible, University of York Centre for Novel Agricultural Products director Simon McQueen-Mason said.
Replacing half of the UK’s plastic bottles could be done using just 3 percent of the sugar beet crop, 5 percent of wheat straw or 2.5 percent of food waste, he said.
“These are the scales we would need to see a large-scale replacement of oil-based plastics,” he said. “It is something that would be practical within the UK, and we’re talking about a very big economic opportunity.”
The UK plastic production industry has an annual turnover of £25 billion. Just a few thousand tonnes of bioplastic are used in the UK each year, compared with millions of tonnes of conventional plastic.
Mines said that this could rise to about 20,000 tonnes over the next five years.
One technology now being scaled up from the lab is using a Rhodococcus bacteria to break down lignin, the very tough material that gives trees and other plants their strength. The bugs naturally eat lignin, but University of Warwick biological chemistry professor Tim Bugg, working with Biome Technologies, has genetically engineered them so they produce useful chemicals for a bioplastic that can be used for bottles.
Lignin was long seen as impossible to break down usefully, but “ten years on [from when I started], people are now saying it may well be possible,” Bugg said.
Lignin is a major waste product in paper and card manufacturing, and is currently burned.
“We shouldn’t be burning biomass, because we can make electricity and heat in more sustainable ways,” McQueen-Mason said. “But we don’t have any other source of the complex carbon chemistry we need to make the fuels, plastics and chemicals that currently come from petroleum.”
Univeristy of Bath professor of sustainable chemistry Janet Scott is tackling the problem of plastic microbeads, which have been banned from facewashes and other products in the UK and elsewhere.
“We didn’t just put microbeads into products for the heck of it,” she said. “You might have bought a skin exfoliant that had microbeads in it to make it slightly rough, and to make you glow and look gorgeous.”
Scott’s answer is to push dissolved cellulose — another tough plant material — through tiny holes and use chemistry to form the drops into tiny biodegradable beads.
Companies around the globe are working on bioplastics, including major players such as BASF SE, Novamont SPA and DowDuPont Inc, Mines said
“This is a global movement,” he added.
Using food crops to make biofuels has been controversial as it could cause price rises and there is wariness about using food crops to produce plastics.
However, McQueen-Mason said that the approach should not be dismissed.
“You can produce as much sugar in North Yorkshire per hectare with sugar beet as they produce in Sao Paulo State in Brazil with sugar cane,” he said. “Sugar beet is an incredibly effective crop in the UK and farmers love it.”
Some companies are using chicory and Jerusalem artichoke to make bioplastics, he said, adding that the crops contain fructose, which is closer to the chemicals required than the sucrose found in sugar beet.
Plastic has become ubiquitous, not only because it is useful, but also because it is extremely cheap, and this presents the biggest challenge to bioplastics.
People will pay a premium for some bioplastic products, such as biodegradable coffee pods that can be composted, Mines said.
However, “I can’t predict if it will ever reach parity,” he said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers