New bioplastics are being made in laboratories from straw, wood chips and food waste, with researchers aiming to replace oil as the source of the world’s plastic. The new approaches include genetically modifying bacteria to eat wood and produce useful chemicals.
However, the bioplastics are significantly more expensive to make than fossil fuel-based plastics.
Land and seas around the world, from high mountains to deep oceans, have become polluted with plastic, prompting major public concern. The world has produced 8 billion tonnes of plastic since the 1950s and demand is still rising. While some waste plastic is recycled, much of it is incinerated to produce electricity, resulting in carbon emissions that drive climate change.
Illustration: Mountain People
In contrast to plastic made from oil, plastics made from plant-based materials only release the carbon that the plants absorbed from the air as they grew. Bioplastics will also give more options for products that biodegrade in the environment, although they can be made very long-lasting if required.
“Plastics are an incredible enhancement to our daily lives,” said Paul Mines, CEO of Biome Technologies in the UK, which has spent £5 million over the past five years on bioplastics research.
Plastic is both light and strong, “but we can’t go on using fossil fuel-based materials,” he said. “About 6 to 7 percent of every barrel of oil is used to make plastics.”
Using plant materials is feasible, University of York Centre for Novel Agricultural Products director Simon McQueen-Mason said.
Replacing half of the UK’s plastic bottles could be done using just 3 percent of the sugar beet crop, 5 percent of wheat straw or 2.5 percent of food waste, he said.
“These are the scales we would need to see a large-scale replacement of oil-based plastics,” he said. “It is something that would be practical within the UK, and we’re talking about a very big economic opportunity.”
The UK plastic production industry has an annual turnover of £25 billion. Just a few thousand tonnes of bioplastic are used in the UK each year, compared with millions of tonnes of conventional plastic.
Mines said that this could rise to about 20,000 tonnes over the next five years.
One technology now being scaled up from the lab is using a Rhodococcus bacteria to break down lignin, the very tough material that gives trees and other plants their strength. The bugs naturally eat lignin, but University of Warwick biological chemistry professor Tim Bugg, working with Biome Technologies, has genetically engineered them so they produce useful chemicals for a bioplastic that can be used for bottles.
Lignin was long seen as impossible to break down usefully, but “ten years on [from when I started], people are now saying it may well be possible,” Bugg said.
Lignin is a major waste product in paper and card manufacturing, and is currently burned.
“We shouldn’t be burning biomass, because we can make electricity and heat in more sustainable ways,” McQueen-Mason said. “But we don’t have any other source of the complex carbon chemistry we need to make the fuels, plastics and chemicals that currently come from petroleum.”
Univeristy of Bath professor of sustainable chemistry Janet Scott is tackling the problem of plastic microbeads, which have been banned from facewashes and other products in the UK and elsewhere.
“We didn’t just put microbeads into products for the heck of it,” she said. “You might have bought a skin exfoliant that had microbeads in it to make it slightly rough, and to make you glow and look gorgeous.”
Scott’s answer is to push dissolved cellulose — another tough plant material — through tiny holes and use chemistry to form the drops into tiny biodegradable beads.
Companies around the globe are working on bioplastics, including major players such as BASF SE, Novamont SPA and DowDuPont Inc, Mines said
“This is a global movement,” he added.
Using food crops to make biofuels has been controversial as it could cause price rises and there is wariness about using food crops to produce plastics.
However, McQueen-Mason said that the approach should not be dismissed.
“You can produce as much sugar in North Yorkshire per hectare with sugar beet as they produce in Sao Paulo State in Brazil with sugar cane,” he said. “Sugar beet is an incredibly effective crop in the UK and farmers love it.”
Some companies are using chicory and Jerusalem artichoke to make bioplastics, he said, adding that the crops contain fructose, which is closer to the chemicals required than the sucrose found in sugar beet.
Plastic has become ubiquitous, not only because it is useful, but also because it is extremely cheap, and this presents the biggest challenge to bioplastics.
People will pay a premium for some bioplastic products, such as biodegradable coffee pods that can be composted, Mines said.
However, “I can’t predict if it will ever reach parity,” he said.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US