Learning about LGBT rights
One of your reporters wrote that “… many educators have received complaints from parents who fear that their children would become gay if they are taught about LGBT rights...” (“Pro-LGBT rights groups promote gender education,” June 29, page 3).
Scientists tell us that a person’s predominant sexual orientation is something that each person has at birth. That predominant orientation might be strengthened or weakened by experiences that the young child has during the first few years of their life, but it is there from birth, so a school-age child — or anyone else — does not “become gay.”
Predominant sexual orientation in a human being, then, is not chosen or the result of any kind of experience.
However, the timing of a person becoming aware of their orientation can be affected by experience.
As mentioned in the article, many young people do become aware of their orientation around the onset of or during puberty.
Yet others come to that awareness earlier in their lives or even much later. There are many external and/or internal factors that can influence the timing of this awareness, so it varies greatly from person to person.
It must be emphasized that it is the awareness that could be provoked, not the predominant orientation itself.
In educating young people about LGBT rights, as with any subject, from pre-K through post-grad, the teacher and how they present the material is a crucial factor in how a student reacts to it, whether it is accepted as practical and relevant to their life, or up in the clouds and only to be remembered — or, unfortunately, memorized.
Finally, homosexual orientation is not something to be feared — such an attitude only makes it harder for a person who discovers themselves to be gay.
Ideally, it simply ought to be recognized and accepted as a minority variation to the majority, and as such, something that is “normal” for the LGBT person.
Many LGBT folks who accept themselves as they find themselves even see the LGBT orientation as a great gift.
MT Young
Nantou
‘One China’ is not a reality
The “one China “ principle is a millstone around Taiwan’s neck.
It weakens the nation on the international stage and facilitates Beijing’s belligerence in the region.
Taiwan’s diplomatic allies will be reluctant to stay when the nations of the democratic West, which should be supporting Taiwan diplomatically — including the US — do not.
The “one China” principle does not represent reality. It is plain to see that China and Taiwan are two distinct political and social entities and never the twain shall meet.
As a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) president said in Okinawa last week, the government could bring some reality to the situation by facilitating a name change to the Republic of Taiwan.
Gavan Duffy
Queensland, Australia
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS