Will Taiwan and the US restore diplomatic ties? Such talk has been unthinkable during the 40 years since the two nations broke off relations in 1979.
It is perhaps not surprising that US Representative Dana Rohrabacher, a steadfast, hawkish pro-Taiwan and anti-China politician, proposed that diplomatic relations with Taiwan be resumed. This is not the first proposal of its kind, but given the situation, perhaps this kind of discussion is once again possible.
This time is different, because the US’ view of China has changed drastically, as Li Ruogu (李若谷), former chairman of the Export-Import Bank of China, “discovered.” He also said that US-China relations are unlikely to continue along the path of the past 40 years.
Hearing such an observation from someone in the Chinese elite is a sign of coming change: The most politically sensitive high-ranking figures in China have become aware that the existing structure of US-China ties is wavering.
Further affirming this fact, the US government and opposition agree that a tough stance toward China is necessary.
This explains the changing “status quo.” From the US’ perspective, China is changing the “status quo” familiar to the US.
China’s ascendancy continues: In the past, it followed Deng Xiaoping’s (鄧小平) policy of “concealing its capabilities and biding its time”; nowadays, it views itself as a world power and needs policies to match that status. It abandoned Deng’s approach long ago, which has rattled the US, helping Donald Trump become US president.
The earth-shattering changes rammed through by Trump have broken past taboos and opened up new possibilities. Economically, the US has launched a trade war against China; politically speaking, someone who can shake hands with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un is probably capable of anything.
The strategic implications of changing US-China relations are so clear that even the Chinese cannot ignore them. It is as if Trump is deliberately shaking the Chinese apple tree to get as much of its fruit to fall to the ground as possible.
This is a very special situation, and it creates more room to breathe for Taiwan, as is abundantly clear from the slew of Taiwan policies that have been announced by the US administration and US Congress.
Under these circumstances, the main significance of talking about whether the US should establish formal ties with Taiwan, which is tantamount to abandoning its “one China” principle, is to warn Beijing that the chips are on the table. In other words, China cannot misjudge the situation, because the US could pull out all the stops.
At this moment, the most urgent task for Taiwan is to grasp this elusive opportunity, as it cannot control how long it will last. When all the apples have fallen to the ground, it must act quickly and collect as many as possible to increase its resilience and elevate its international status.
To accomplish this, Taiwan needs a comprehensive and sensitive approach to the US; this is one of the greatest responsibilities of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and her administration, which has come to power in the nick of time.
Tzou Jiing-wen is the editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times (the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times).
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
There has been much catastrophizing in Taiwan recently about America becoming more unreliable as a bulwark against Chinese pressure. Some of this has been sparked by debates in Washington about whether the United States should defend Taiwan in event of conflict. There also were understandable anxieties about whether President Trump would sacrifice Taiwan’s interests for a trade deal when he sat down with President Xi (習近平) in late October. On top of that, Taiwan’s opposition political leaders have sought to score political points by attacking the Lai (賴清德) administration for mishandling relations with the United States. Part of this budding anxiety
The diplomatic dispute between China and Japan over Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s comments in the Japanese Diet continues to escalate. In a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, China’s UN Ambassador Fu Cong (傅聰) wrote that, “if Japan dares to attempt an armed intervention in the cross-Strait situation, it would be an act of aggression.” There was no indication that Fu was aware of the irony implicit in the complaint. Until this point, Beijing had limited its remonstrations to diplomatic summonses and weaponization of economic levers, such as banning Japanese seafood imports, discouraging Chinese from traveling to Japan or issuing
The diplomatic spat between China and Japan over comments Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made on Nov. 7 continues to worsen. Beijing is angry about Takaichi’s remarks that military force used against Taiwan by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could constitute a “survival-threatening situation” necessitating the involvement of the Japanese Self-Defense Forces. Rather than trying to reduce tensions, Beijing is looking to leverage the situation to its advantage in action and rhetoric. On Saturday last week, four armed China Coast Guard vessels sailed around the Japanese-controlled Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), known to Japan as the Senkakus. On Friday, in what
On Nov. 8, newly elected Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) and Vice Chairman Chi Lin-len (季麟連) attended a memorial for White Terror era victims, during which convicted Chinese Communist Party (CCP) spies such as Wu Shi (吳石) were also honored. Cheng’s participation in the ceremony, which she said was part of her efforts to promote cross-strait reconciliation, has trapped herself and her party into the KMT’s dark past, and risks putting the party back on its old disastrous road. Wu, a lieutenant general who was the Ministry of National Defense’s deputy chief of the general staff, was recruited
RSS