Warmer weather and less rainfall earlier this year have led to a banana glut and a price collapse. Banana farmers are hurting deeply, and although the Council of Agriculture has adopted several response measures to resolve the situation, they are all temporary expedient measures that are likely to have little effect.
In Ecuador, bananas are considered “green gold” and are one of three major sources of export income, along with whiteleg shrimp — “white gold” — and oil — “black gold.” When I served as the director-general of the Commercial Office of the Republic of China at Guayaquil from 1991 to 1994, more than US$800 million of bananas were exported annually to Europe and South and North America.
The Chilean government’s fruit marketing is even more astonishing, with yearly exports to more than 100 countries exceeding US$5 billion.
In July 2016, I submitted two op-ed pieces on the success of Ecuador’s and Chile’s marketing strategies to the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper), urging the government to send officials to these countries to learn from their fruit marketing strategies in the hope that they could serve as models for Taiwan and help solve the nation’s frequent overproduction, price collapses and stalled sales.
Regrettably, the articles did not seem to attract much attention from the government.
Taiwan has been called the “kingdom of fruit.” Before the nation’s economy took off, canned starfruit and pineapple exported to the European and US markets generated large sums of foreign-exchange reserves for the nation, paving the way for Taiwan’s industrial and business development by attracting abundant capital.
Even before that, Ngo Chin-sui (吳振瑞), a Pingtung County banana farmer, founded the well-known non-profit organization Taiwan Province Fruit Marketing Cooperative, facilitating the export of large volumes of bananas to Japan.
This earned banana farmers a lot of foreign currency, increased their income and greatly improved their living conditions. Banana farmers still fondly remember Ngo and his successful promotion of Taiwanese bananas.
Assisted by county and municipal governments, several fruit export businesses have had considerable success selling Taiwanese starfruit, guavas, mangos, bananas and lychees to Canada, Japan and the Middle East.
However, these businesses are competing single-handedly, with limited funds. In addition, assistance from local governments is not forthcoming, so there is a long way to go before Taiwan can start to export fruit on a larger scale.
Hopefully the central government could come forward to coordinate these exporters and fruit farmers, and set up a national fruit export association like the Chilean Fresh Fruit Exporters Association.
During the initial stages, it could provide capital and help with packaging, marketing and shelf life extension for exports. That could be followed by the Bureau of Foreign Trade, the Taiwan External Trade Development Council and the nation’s overseas offices assisting in marketing.
This is what is needed to open a new export phase for Taiwan’s outstanding agricultural products, inject new energy into the nation’s export businesses, facilitate economic growth in rural areas and attract younger generations to return home and take up fruit farming.
Ko Jai-son is the former director-general of the Oficina Comercial de la Republica de China (Taiwan) in Guayaquil, Ecuador, and former government representative at the Oficina Economica y Cultural de Taipei en Chile.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers