The climate crisis we now face is a reflection of a broader crisis: A global confusion of means and ends. We continue to use fossil fuels because we can (means), not because they are good for us (ends).
This confusion is why Pope Francis and Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew are spurring us to think deeply about what is truly good for humanity, and how to attain it.
Earlier this month, the pope and patriarch each convened business, scientific, and academic leaders in Rome and Athens respectively, to hasten the transition from fossil fuels to safe renewable energy.
In most of the world, the purposes of politics, economics and technology have been debased. Politics is regarded as a no-holds-barred fight for power, economics as a ruthless scramble for wealth, and technology as the magic elixir for more economic growth.
In truth, according to Francis and Bartholomew, we need politics, economics and technology to serve a far greater purpose than power, wealth or economic growth. We need them to promote human well-being today and for future generations.
The US might be the most confused of all. The US today is rich beyond imagining, with median household income and GDP per capita each equal to nearly US$60,000. The US could have it all. Instead, what it has is widening income inequality, falling life expectancy, a rising suicide rate and epidemics of obesity, opioid overdoses, school shootings, depressive disorders and other grave ills.
The US last year incurred US$300 billion in losses from climate-related disasters, including three massive hurricanes — the frequency and intensity of which has risen — owing to fossil-fuel dependence. The US has vast power, wealth and growth, and yet diminished well-being.
The US economy and politics are in the hands of corporate lobbies, including Big Oil. Resources are relentlessly allocated to developing more oil and gas fields not because they are good for the US or the world, but because the shareholders and managers of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Conoco Philipps and others demand it.
US President Donald Trump and his minions work daily to undermine global agreements and domestic regulations that have been put in place to accelerate the shift from fossil fuels to renewable energy.
Yes, we can produce more oil, coal and gas, but for what? Not for our safety: The hazards of global warming are already upon us. Not because we lack alternatives: The US has ample wind, solar, hydro and other sources of primary energy that do not cause global warming.
The US economy, alas, is an out-of-control juggernaut, chasing oil wealth and jeopardizing our very survival.
Of course the US is not alone in the mad pursuit of wealth over well-being. The same get-rich-quick confusion of means and ends is causing Argentina, host of the G20 summit later this year, to pursue fracking of natural gas, with all the associated climate and environmental risks, instead of tapping its bounteous potential in wind, solar and hydro power.
The same corruption of purpose is causing the Canadian government to guarantee a new pipeline to export output from its polluting and expensive oil sands to Asia, while under-investing in Canada’s vast renewable energy sources.
In his meeting with the chief executive officers of major oil and gas companies, Francis told them: “Our desire to ensure energy for all must not lead to the undesired effect of a spiral of extreme climate changes due to a catastrophic rise in global temperatures, harsher environments, and increased levels of poverty.”
He said that the oil companies are engaged in “the continued search for new fossil-fuel reserves, whereas the Paris Agreement clearly urged keeping most fossil fuels underground.”
He reminded the executives that “civilization requires energy, but energy use must not destroy civilization.”
Francis underscored the moral dimension of the problem: “The transition to accessible and clean energy is a duty that we owe toward millions of our brothers and sisters around the world, poorer countries and generations yet to come. Decisive progress on this path cannot be made without an increased awareness that all of us are part of one human family, united by bonds of fraternity and solidarity. Only by thinking and acting with constant concern for this underlying unity that overrides all differences, only by cultivating a sense of universal intergenerational solidarity, can we set out really and resolutely on the road ahead.”
As Francis was meeting the chief executive officers in Rome last week, Bartholomew was similarly convening leaders of scientific institutions, UN agencies, and major faiths in Athens and the Peloponnese to chart a path to environmental safety.
Bartholomew also underscored the fundamental moral concern.
“The identity of every society and measure of every culture are not judged by the degree of technological development, economic growth or public infrastructure,” he said. “Our civil life and civilization are defined and judged primarily by our respect for the dignity of humanity and integrity of nature.”
The 300 million faithful of the Eastern church led by the Ecumenical Patriarch are in lands facing extreme dangers from global warming: intense heat waves, rising sea levels and increasingly severe droughts.
The Mediterranean region is already beset by environmental distress and forced migration from conflict zones. Unchecked climate change — which has already contributed to conflict — would spell disaster for the region.
Bartholomew’s conference opened at the Acropolis, the very heart of ancient Athens, where 2,300 years ago Aristotle defined ethics and politics as the quest for well-being.
The political community should aim “at the highest good,” to be achieved by cultivating the virtues of the citizenry, Aristotle wrote.
Aristotle famously contrasted two types of knowledge: techne (technical know-how) and phronesis (practical wisdom).
Scientists and engineers have given us the technical knowledge to move rapidly from fossil fuels to zero-carbon energy. Francis and Bartholomew urge us to find the phronesis, the practical wisdom, to redirect our politics and economies toward the common good.
Jeffrey Sachs, a professor of sustainable development and a professor of health policy and management at Columbia University, is director of Columbia’s Center for Sustainable Development and the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers