Husam Idris dreams of returning to his bakery in the Syrian city of Aleppo, but three years after escaping the war, he worries that a new law allowing the Syrian government to seize homes for redevelopment will scupper his plans.
“I grew up in the bakery. I can’t imagine losing it,” said Idris, a 37-year-old father of three who now lives in Germany.
While Syria’s Law 10, or Decree 10, has yet to be applied, rights groups and governments hosting Syrian refugees say that they risk becoming permanent exiles if they lose their properties, because it would remove a major incentive to return one day.
Idris is at the Syrian embassy in Berlin trying to arrange power of attorney for his mother back home, so she can stake a claim to his bakery and apartment in the Kallaseh neighborhood of Aleppo, recaptured from rebels two years ago.
He is not alone. The new law has prompted a rush of visitors to the embassy.
One worker at the mission, who declined to give his name, said that since the law took effect in April, 10 to 15 Syrians a day have come to request power of attorney for relatives at home, up from a handful beforehand.
According to the UN’s refugee agency, 6 million Syrians have been displaced within the country and there are nearly 5.5 million refugees outside Syria.
Germany hosts some 650,000 Syrians, the most of any Western country, and it is particularly worried about the law.
Berlin’s fear is that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad could use Law 10 to bulldozer former opposition bastions seized by the government and replace them with new property developments populated by government supporters.
“Decree 10 is designed to expropriate refugees,” a senior German government official said.
“It is pretty clear that al-Assad’s goal is to replace the old population with a new one,” said the official, who was briefed on talks between German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Russian President Vladimir Putin about the issue.
The Syrian government has dismissed concerns about the law as a “disinformation campaign,” saying that it needs to rebuild areas destroyed in the war and regulate illegal settlements.
“This law comes within the framework of the Reconstruction Program, and has an organizational character aimed at regulating slum areas in Syria, especially in light of the destruction of many of the areas that were controlled by terrorists,” Syria’s mission to the UN in Geneva said last month.
SECURITY COUNCIL
What started out as protests against al-Assad in 2011 turned into a civil war that has often pitted the country’s Sunni majority against al-Assad’s minority Alawites and Shiite allies. Russia intervened militarily in 2015 to help swing the conflict in favor of al-Assad.
Within the region, Turkey is home to 3.5 million Syrian refugees and there are nearly 1 million living in Lebanon, which has also expressed concern that Law 10 could discourage the mainly Sunni refugees there from returning home.
Law 10 originally gave proprietors 30 days to prove ownership or lose their rights. The Syrian government extended the period to one year earlier this month to allay fears that refugees and the displaced could lose their homes.
Besides Russia, Germany has raised concerns about the Syrian legislation with its EU partners and has managed to get the issue onto the UN Security Council’s agenda.
“The fact that the UN Security Council has taken note of the decree is a good starting point,” a second German official said. “But clearly effective pressure on al-Assad not to implement the decree has to come from Russia.”
While Law 10 says that relatives in Syria can stake claims, Syrian lawyers say that in practice, power of attorney still needs to be given to an individual so that the authorities know which relative is the chosen legal agent.
Lawyers and rights groups also say that anyone making a property claim needs to have a security clearance, adding that this could lead to Syrians who fled from former opposition strongholds being disenfranchised.
“The regime has a history of arbitrary expropriations to serve its economic and security interests and unfair land expropriations was one of the triggers of the rebellion,” Syrian human rights lawyer Anwar al-Bunni said.
“Who is going to dare claim property in an opposition area that the regime turned into rubble because it views its inhabitants as Sunni terrorists? Even if they dared, they will not get clearance if the regime wants the land,” he said.
LAW 66
Human rights groups, Syrian lawyers and refugees said a previous law pitched by the government as necessary for redevelopment had been applied in opposition areas to force out inhabitants perceived as dissenters.
They said Law 66, approved by al-Assad in 2012 to redevelop slums in Damascus, was applied in neighborhoods southwest of the capital where protests against al-Assad erupted at the start of the rebellion in 2011, including in Basateen al-Razi.
Local authorities used land there expropriated under Law 66 for a luxury residential project of 12,000 housing units that al-Assad inaugurated in 2016. Now, some Syrian refugees fear that Law 10 will be used in a similar way nationwide.
“The problem is not in the law itself. The problem is how and where it’s going to be implemented,” said Sinan Hatahet, a Syria expert at the Al Sharq Forum think tank.
“If you lived in a bombed-out opposition area, you’re most likely not going to get security clearance, so your right to ownership is automatically gone,” he said.
France said the law was a serious obstacle to a lasting political solution to the Syrian conflict, as it allowed refugees’ property to be plundered.
“This is a new stage in the brutal strategy of crowding out entire sections of the Syrian population that the Damascus regime has been implementing for several years,” French Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Agnes von der Muhll said.
‘FORGET THE PAST’
At the Syrian embassy in Berlin, refugees line up in a room with three counters for consular services, a picture of al-Assad over the middle counter looking out on about 50 people waiting their turn.
Of the handful of Syrians who agreed to talk to reporters about Law 10, most asked to be identified by nicknames, saying that they feared for their safety and that of loved ones in Syria.
One man who goes by the nickname Abu Ahmed was at the embassy to give power of attorney to his brother, so he can stake a claim to Abu Ahmed’s depot in Yarmouk, a district of Damascus established as a Palestinian refugee camp in 1957.
Like many of the buildings in Yarmouk, Abu Ahmed’s depot — used for storing and selling light bulbs — was built illegally. Certificates from a notary are the only proof of ownership that he has.
“My wife thinks I’m crazy to obsess about the depot. The whole camp has been turned into rubble and we are lucky to be alive,” the 47-year-old trader said.
He has little hope that the government will grant his brother a security clearance should Yarmouk be redeveloped.
“We are marked because we lived in Yarmouk. The moukhabarat [secret police] will never give us a security clearance, but I have to try,” said Abu Ahmed, who now lives in Berlin.
The Norwegian Refugee Council estimates that about half of Syrian’s pre-war population of 22 million lived in urban areas with about one-third of those in slums.
“They don’t need laws to steal our properties. They do as they please and no one can stop them,” said Um Ahmed, standing by her husband. “I keep telling Abu Ahmed, ‘forget the past,’ but he can’t. He still dreams of a return.”
Outside the embassy in Berlin, Idris wonders if asking his mother to act as agent for his Aleppo bakery was the right decision.
“She is old, ill and probably won’t live much longer,” he said. “My brothers and sisters are in Turkey, so my cousins are the only other option. But they’ve lost everything and have no income. They’ve been selling land that they own outside Aleppo for peanuts to survive. They’ll probably sell my property too.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers