From tech giant Facebook to libraries and schools, organizations are now subject to the world’s most far-reaching data privacy regulation in a crackdown aimed at protecting people from losing control over their personal information.
It has occupied thousands of lawyers, taken years of planning and triggered billions of e-mails.
Mess up now and you can expect very little tolerance, said European Data Protection Board chair Andrea Jelinek, the Austrian in charge of policing the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which took effect on Friday.
“If there are reasons to warn we will warn; if there are reasons to reprimand we will do that; and if we have reasons to fine, we are going to fine,” Jelinek, 57, told reporters ahead of the big day.
Asked about criticism that some regulators are more lenient than others, she said that “it was like that in the past, but it should not continue in the future.”
Privacy has moved from a niche topic to one of the biggest headaches for top bosses such as Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, who last week was grilled by EU lawmakers about how the data of about 87 million users and their friends may have been shared with a consulting firm with links to then-US presidential candidate Donald Trump’s US presidential campaign.
The pressure has been increasing on firms using or processing EU personal data in the run-up to the deadline. Privacy regulators across Europe for the first time get equal rights and responsibilities, and the same powers to mete out fines of as much as 4 percent of worldwide annual sales for serious violations.
Not everyone is willing to wait for Jelinek and regulators to flex their new powers.
Austrian lawyer Max Schrems, who has taken on Facebook many times and won a landmark EU court ruling in 2015, filed four complaints on Friday under the new rules, accusing Google, Facebook and also WhatsApp and Instagram of forcing users to agree to new privacy policies.
“Facebook has even blocked accounts of users who have not given consent,” Schrems said in an e-mailed statement. “In the end, users only had the choice to delete the account or hit the ‘agree’ button — that’s not a free choice, it more reminds of a North Korean election process.”
The 30-year-old’s group called “noyb” — for none of your business — filed what are likely the first GDPR complaints with national regulators in Belgium, France, Austria and Germany.
“We have prepared for the past 18 months to ensure we meet the requirements of the GDPR,” Facebook’s chief privacy officer Erin Egan said in an e-mailed statement. “We have made our policies clearer, our privacy settings easier to find and introduced better tools for people to access, download, and delete their information.”
Facebook’s “work to improve people’s privacy doesn’t stop on May 25,” Egan said.
EU nations will have to apply the same rules across the bloc, and give their data regulators complete independence.
“We don’t like to see any deviations which will go beyond the rules and spirit” of the rules, EU Justice Commissioner Vera Jourova said earlier in the month.
Facebook would dodge the tough new sanctions under the updated EU rules if any violations in the Cambridge Analytica case are proven because the rules do not apply retroactively.
Still, if companies “don’t stop on Friday, we can get them,” said Jelinek who leads Austria’s data privacy agency as well as board of regulators drawn from across the EU’s 28 nations.
She said she was expecting a big pile of complaints to be filed from day one of the new rules.
Regulators would “try to do our best” to deal with all complaints, she said.
She expects it would not be even two months until the first probes will be opened, but there would not be any fines right away.
Officials would not just be “popping in” to companies to slap a fine on them, she said.
“We are talking to the businesses, we have legal procedures to fulfill, we have to give them the opportunity to talk with us too,” she said.
It will be the start of a new era for everyone: “We are at the beginning of a journey, which we’re going to make together through the field of data protection,” she added.
The last few years have seen a “paradigm shift in awareness of data protection issues,” said Andrew Dyson, a lawyer at DLA Piper in London.
“You can’t open a newspaper without reading about the latest data breach, social media scandal or unethical marketing campaign. There is regulation, but it’s from a different era and increasingly looking toothless and out of date. The GDPR will reset the balance,” he said.
Companies “that get this right will establish high ethical standards, enhanced levels of consumer trust and be able to unlock the value of data,” he said. “Those who get it wrong face wrath of regulators, disgruntled customers and big constraints on digital innovation.”
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past