There are far more than three billboards outside Roscommon and their opposing messages indicate an intensifying battle for undecided voters in a historic referendum on abortion this month.
On the roads into this quiet town in the middle of rural Ireland, it is impossible to miss the laminated placards fixed to the street lights.
Some have one from each camp, vying for the attention of passersby in a polarized campaign in which voters have to make a binary choice between yes and no.
Illustration: Mountain people
A few hoardings have been torn down in the night, in a sign of strongly held beliefs, but mostly the people of Roscommon are holding their views close, unwilling to discuss with each other — let alone a stranger — where they will place their cross on May 25.
Three years after Ireland, where historically the Catholic Church has been the undisputed moral authority, became the first state in the world to endorse same-sex marriage in a popular vote, people are going to the polls again.
This time, the Irish are being asked whether they want to repeal the eighth amendment — a clause in the constitution that protects “the right to life of the unborn.”
The amendment means legal abortion is impossible in Ireland, even in cases of rape or fatal fetal abnormality, although about 3,500 women travel to the UK each year for terminations and another 2,000 illegally order abortion pills online.
The referendum, along with public opinion surveys that indicate a majority in favor of repeal, is a measure of how far Ireland has changed within a generation or so, but Roscommon-South Leitrim, the only one of 43 constituencies to vote against same-sex marriage, albeit by a slim margin, might buck the trend again.
“There are very deeply held feelings here, it’s a small, tight community,” local business man David Molloy said. “The issue of abortion is very much at the core of Catholic belief. Even though there will be people here who have had abortions or know someone who has had an abortion, it would never be spoken about.”
In a campaign in which the generational divide is seen as significant, the county has one of the oldest age profiles in Ireland, largely a result of young people leaving to find work or go to university.
It has also seen a remarkable influx of immigrants in the past two decades: Brazilians recruited to work in the meat industry, eastern Europeans and a smattering of families fleeing the war in Syria.
The changes have been striking.
Once, the Catholic Church was the only religious show in town; now there are more than a dozen Christian denominations, including a Nigerian and a Brazilian church.
In nearby Ballaghaderreen, plans last year to convert a historic convent into a mosque caused a row.
“There are dozens of different nationalities in the local school — a complete transformation from a generation ago,” said Paul Healy, editor of local newspaper Roscommon People.
Cultural and social changes include tacit acceptance of things once seen as scandalous: couples living together and children born outside marriage, and “even one or two” gay partnerships, Molloy said.
“The influence of the church has taken a massive knock, partly as a result of the [child sexual] abuse scandals and the cover-ups, but also because my generation are less deferential and more questioning, and then there’s the Internet,” he said.
Even so, the town’s imposing Sacred Heart church, decorated with mosaics inspired by Botticelli and Michelangelo, still attracts a relatively healthy congregation on Sunday mornings, although many pews are sparsely filled.
Father John Cullen, Sacred Heart’s priest for just over a year, was reluctant to be drawn on the voting intentions of his congregation.
“My understanding is that people are still trying to form an opinion,” he said with a revealing uncertainty, while firmly restating the church’s right to life doctrine.
“There isn’t the stomach for battle in the church that there was 10 or 15 years ago. There’s no sense of fire and fury. I think the no side is probably resigned to defeat, though it’s not a done deal, and there is certainly a hidden minority of people whose voices are not being heard,” Healy said.
In Ballaghaderreen last weekend, a dozen yes campaigners were taking the case for repeal door to door.
By and large, they were received courteously, with residents fairly evenly split between yes, no and undecided.
Doireann Markham, one of the canvassers, said she was reasonably happy with the reception, “but I’m aware that typical [County] Roscommon discretion makes it very hard to call.”
“Nationally, the wind is blowing towards a yes vote, but there is a wide expectation that Roscommon will vote no. We’re fighting an uphill battle, but it’s a national referendum, so every single vote counts,” she said.
Her impression was that as many as 40 percent of voters in the county had yet to make up their minds — double the figure in a national opinion poll for the Irish Times.
“There is absolutely everything to play for,” Markham said.
One issue that campaigners on both sides have come up against is the government’s stated intention to follow a vote for repeal with legislation allowing abortion on demand up to the 12th week of pregnancy.
“People on the doorstep are definitely worried about the 12-week issue,” said Mary McDermott, another yes campaigner in Roscommon.
“When you explain to people that repeal will be followed by abortion on demand, they are very surprised and shocked. There’s definitely a feeling that it’s a step too far,” said Sile Quinlan, campaigning for a no vote in Sligo.
The proposed legislation would give Ireland a more liberal abortion law than the UK.
Quinlan tells voters that one in 19 pregnancies in Ireland ends in abortion, whereas in the UK the figure is one in five.
“We look at Britain and we can see what the potential future is. When you ask people how they’d feel if Ireland was to move in that direction, there’s a very clear message that people don’t want to follow the UK,” she said.
She is “not particularly religious” and voted in favor of same-sex marriage three years ago, but repeal would mean “handing all power over to politicians to decide” on the subsequent legislation and Quinlan feels that many people such as her — she was adopted after a crisis pregnancy — and those with disabilities would not be born.
She said there was strong support for a no vote and the media, seen as favorable to repeal, was not listening.
“Many ordinary people feel that an equal voice has not been given to those who want to retain the eighth amendment,” Quinlan said.
In Roscommon, few people were willing to share their opinions.
One exception was Denny Fehily, 65, a regular churchgoer and volunteer at the town’s museum.
“I think Roscommon will vote against repeal. There just aren’t that many young people and this is a generational thing, but I’m voting yes and so are all my family. Young people are going to go to England [for abortions] one way or another. It’s happening — we can’t ignore it,” Fehily said.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past