Late last year, as the South African government faced the prospect of its largest city running out of water, it took an unprecedented gamble.
The government announced “day zero” — a moment when dam levels would be so low that it would turn off the taps in Cape Town and send people to communal water collection points.
This apocalyptic notion prompted water stockpiling and panic, caused a drop in tourism bookings and raised the specter of civil unrest.
Illustration: Yusha
It also worked.
After years of trying to convince residents to conserve, the aggressive campaign jolted people into action. Water use was — and still is — restricted to 50 liters per person per day. (In 2016, average daily per capita use in California was 321 liters.) Households that exceed the limit face hefty fines, or having a meter installed in their home that shuts off their water once they go over.
Capetonians started showering standing over buckets to catch and reuse that water, recycling washing machine water and limiting toilet flushes to once a day.
“It was the most talked about thing in Cape Town for months when it needed to be,” said Priya Reddy, the city’s communication director. “It was not a pretty solution, but it was not a pretty problem.”
Cape Town’s water use dropped from 600 million liters per day in the middle last year to 507 million liters per day at the end of last month. That is still short of the 450 million the city should be using, but Reddy said it could not have been achieved otherwise.
“We really did need to make it alarming enough; otherwise day zero would have happened,” he said.
The day zero campaign made us all think twice about water,” Sue Fox said, after collecting several liters of drinking water for her household from a natural spring in Newlands, an upmarket Cape Town enclave. “We’ll never, ever, ever take water for granted again.”
As global temperatures continue to rise, cities around the world will have to figure out how to do more with less water. The Western Cape’s multipronged response to its water crisis — from farming innovations to reducing urban water use to diversifying water supply sources — could serve as a blueprint for cities that find themselves, like Cape Town, looking at near-empty dams.
“We have pushed the limits far more than most other cities,” said Cape Town Executive Deputy Mayor Ian Neilson, who is in charge of the city’s water crisis response. “Millions of people have responded — literally millions.”
However, it is not all positive stories of innovation, responsibility and altruism. Farmers in the drought-affected area have had to abandon as much as one-quarter of their crops, by some estimates, and tens of thousands of agricultural jobs have been lost in the fray.
“This is the one that makes me the most depressed,” Derick van Zyl said, pointing to a long row of parched trees in his apple orchard.
These trees on the Esperanto Farm produce Pink Lady apples, a coveted variety exported thousands of kilometers to the UK and Europe. They have not been watered in months.
Esperanto is one of hundreds of fruit farms in Western Cape that has had to get creative to cope with the drought. Despite Esperanto’s dams being at 28 percent capacity as of October last year, most of its orchards have been luckier than these bedraggled Pink Ladys, thanks to water-saving hacks like nighttime irrigation, mulching and concentrating water around the trees’ roots systems.
Production is down, but not as much as it could be.
Finding ways to farm with less water is the new normal, Van Zyl said.
Even if the Western Cape’s drought ends with the upcoming rainy season — and that is a big if — climate change means warmer temperatures are on the way, he said.
“There isn’t going to be more water. We’ll have to make due with what we’ve got,” he said.
The combination of measures appears to have averted water armageddon — for now. The city has pushed back the day zero date to next year.
The move met with a heady mix of relief and exasperation. People wondered whether it had been a hoax, or an attempt for the city to make money off higher water fines.
The city has also faced criticism that it allowed political turmoil within city hall — Cape Town Mayor Patricia de Lille has been under fire for months — to slow down its response to the water crisis.
Neilson said the decision to call off day zero came down to transparency.
“It was about being honest with the public,” he said. “People would quickly call us out if we didn’t tell the truth. Our credibility would be lost.”
Now the city is charged with the onerous task of making sure residents do not slip back into their old habits. Though day zero is out of the immediate picture, the major dams that supply water to the Western Cape are still only about 20 percent full. If the rains do not show up during winter, day zero could still happen.
However, by then the city hopes to boost its water supply through methods that do not rely on rainfall, like repairing water delivery infrastructure, drilling boreholes to access groundwater, desalination and water reuse.
A lot of ideas about how to bring more water to Cape Town have come past Neilson’s desk, including cloud seeding, harvesting water from the air and even towing a 100 million tonne iceberg from Antarctica.
“When somebody first tells you about it, you think it’s a crazy idea,” said Nick Sloane, a ship salvager who has been pitching the idea of the iceberg plan. “But the more you learn about it, it’s like, ‘why not?’”
Others would like to see the city look for long-term solutions closer to home.
Christine Colvin, a water expert with the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), has been pushing the government to eliminate thirsty invasive species like pine, eucalyptus and wattle, which deplete dam reserves.
By clearing non-native plants that are sucking up 38 million cubic meters of precious water each year, Colvin said that Cape Town could be getting 7 percent more water annually.
WWF has been saying this for awhile, but when the dams were full, nobody was listening.
“There wasn’t really a case for it,” Colvin said. “Now, our dams are running dry.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers