Despite its self-proclaimed “peaceful rise,” China appears eager to flaunt its self-perceived superiority by imposing “Chinese values” on the rest of the world, while pushing an agenda aimed at establishing the false impression that Taiwan is a part of it.
What are these “Chinese values”? Judging by Chinese communist ideology, they seem to be no more than an overbearing attitude and a total lack of respect for human rights and the freedom of expression.
A case in point is GQ China withdrawing a job offer to GQ Taiwan editor-in-chief Blues To (杜祖業), allegedly due to a ribbon he wore at a farewell party in Taipei that read “take back the mainland.”
Another example is Beijing pressuring international companies, including German automaker Daimler and auto supplier Robert Bosch, into changing Taiwan’s name on their Web sites to “Taiwan (China).”
Government agencies and global non-governmental organizations have also been targeted by Beijing.
Nigeria, Bahrain, Ecuador, the United Arab Emirates and Jordan cited pressure from China when requesting the removal of the words “Republic of China” or “Taiwan” from the names of Taiwan’s representative offices in their nations, while the World Gold Council in its latest Gold Demand Trends report mentioned “the People’s Republic of China” when naming Taiwan.
Yet another example is a letter the Chinese Civil Aviation Administration on April 25 sent to 36 foreign airlines, including US carriers, demanding that they change the references to Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau on their Web sites to conform with the Chinese Communist Party’s standards.
To is a victim of China’s augmented “Big Brother” ego, while the other cases demonstrate Beijing’s continuous attempts to belittle Taiwan by interfering in other nations’ and entities’ internal affairs.
However, with its letters of demand to airlines, China seems to have bitten off more than it could chew, as the White House on Saturday slammed the letters as “Orwellian nonsense,” saying it was “part of a growing trend by the Chinese Communist Party to impose its political views on American citizens and private companies.”
China’s rulers, who apparently think that the world revolves around them, have challenged the democratic values treasured by the US.
Taiwanese have often criticized the international community for what they perceived as a hypocritical display of friendship with Taiwan, as nations smile at it only to turn around and fawn over China, not daring to speak up against its despotism.
Moreover, due to China’s bullying and overbearing attitude, Taiwan and Taiwanese are often subjected to absurd treatment at international events, where the nation’s sovereignty is downgraded through the use of ludicrous titles.
The White House’s denunciation may have been made mostly out of consideration of its national interests, but Taiwan still appreciated the US’ concern.
Any nation that truly values democracy should side with Taiwan — which is touted as a success story in a region beset by authoritarian regimes and populist strongmen and strongwomen.
The US’ denunciation of China’s attempts to meddle in other nations’ and entities’ affairs should serve as a paragon for other nations on issues pertaining to the promotion — and protection — of democratic values.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing