The Dominican Republic on Monday announced that it had switched its diplomatic recognition from Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China. This is an unfortunate development: Few sights in the world today could be more unfortunate than a democratic nation sacrificing its most basic values for monetary enticements from a dictatorship, even if it is a sight to which all have grown accustomed.
Although this switch leaves Taiwan with only 19 formal diplomatic allies on the global stage, it is a development of no fundamental significance: much ado about nothing.
Many major media outlets are reporting that this further increases Taiwan’s “diplomatic isolation,” but in terms of fundamental values, it is China, and not Taiwan, that is rightly isolated in the expanding community of democratic nations today.
This is because the government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is fundamentally illegitimate. It lives in fear of its own people, and in growing conflict with the outside world.
It diverts massive sums of money from its own people to collect diplomatic allies to support the fairy tale that it is a legitimate government and that Taiwan should be placed under its control. This is essentially a face (mianzi, 面子) project: precisely the type of project at which the Chinese Communist Party has excelled since its founding nearly a century ago.
By contrast, the Taiwanese government is fully legitimate. It lives in a dynamic, open and accountable relationship with its people, and is developing in step with the trend of democratization around the world.
Taiwan has, like China, diverted large sums of money to maintain diplomatic allies to avoid perceived isolation, but the rapid disappearance of an increasing number of these allies suggests that competing with Beijing in this realm is pointless.
Instead, Taiwan should recognize that, unlike the PRC government, it has no need to engage in such competitive face projects: It has real sources of legitimacy and authority.
The PRC government’s fundamental illegitimacy drives it to seek legitimacy and authority via the superficial submission of other more legitimate systems of governance to its model, with reliably depressing results.
No matter how much propaganda Beijing might pull together about the supposed success of “one country, two systems,” no sane individual anywhere in the world who knows anything about Hong Kong since 1997 thinks that the territory is better off under Beijing’s control.
Although an increasing number of countries have come to recognize “one China,” no sane individual anywhere in the world who knows anything about Taiwan today could ever be comfortable with the idea of totalitarian China ruling democratic Taiwan.
This is particularly true as the political situation in Beijing has grown ever darker in recent years, increasingly isolating the PRC from broader, global democratic trends. Anyone who visits China today cannot help but notice that it is a dictatorship gradually drifting backward toward a harder form of dictatorship.
As taboo topics proliferate and lawyers, writers, activists and others simply trying to exercise their constitutionally guaranteed freedoms are arbitrarily sent away to lengthy prison terms, the nation is denied its most dynamic thinkers, replaced by one volume after another of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) “Thought” with a capital T.
Even as China gains allies, one after another, the people of the world look on in dismay and disgust at the PRC government’s behavior domestically and internationally.
By contrast, even as its formal allies fade away, Taiwan is winning in terms of values, cultivating dedicated allies all around the world. Anyone who visits Taiwan today knows that it is a thriving democracy in which all topics are on the table for open discussion.
According to a recent Reporters Without Borders report, Taiwan has the best press freedom in all of Asia. As the New York Times reported in the middle of last month, a human rights festival once held in Hong Kong has been forced to move to Taiwan, as has Causeway Bay Books, which sold books critical of the Beijing government, leading to a number of booksellers being caught in shocking extra-legal, cross-border kidnapping schemes.
However many formal diplomatic allies Taiwan loses, it continues to gain informal allies around the world, those dedicated to the universal values of peace, democracy and openness.
As these informal alliances grow, China should not allow its diplomatic face project to give it too much false confidence. The PRC government being recognized by the government of the Dominican Republic does not make Beijing any more legitimate, nor even more liked worldwide.
Although Beijing’s elaborate diplomatic blackmail might induce nations to recognize the PRC to the exclusion of the Taiwanese government, it is easy to know where the genuine sympathies of believers in democracy and freedom really lie.
As a falsely confident Beijing continues to increase pressure on Taiwan, informal allies in societies and governments worldwide remind Taiwanese of a simple and undeniable fact: Taiwan is an exceptional nation with an open, democratic, accountable and independent government with citizens who will never yield nor submit to the dictators in Beijing.
Kevin Carrico is lecturer in Chinese Studies at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US