Scientists have begun an experiment aimed at solving one of astronomy’s most intriguing puzzles: the great Martian methane mystery.
In the next few months they hope to determine whether tantalizing whiffs of the gas that have been detected on the Red Planet are geological in origin — or are produced by living organisms.
On Earth, methane is produced mostly by microbes, although the gas can also be generated by relatively simple geological processes underground.
The ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter, which has been maneuvering itself above Mars for more than a year, has been designed to determine which of these sources is responsible for the planet’s methane.
Last week, sensors on the craft were deployed and began making their first measurements of the planet’s atmosphere.
“If we find traces of methane that are mixed with more complex organic molecules, it will be a strong sign that methane on Mars has a biological source and that it is being produced — or was once produced — by living organisms,” European Space Agency senior adviser for science and exploration Mark McCaughrean said. “However, if we find it is mixed with gases such as sulfur dioxide, that will suggest its source is geological, not biological. In addition, methane made biologically tends to contain lighter isotopes of the element carbon than methane that is made geologically.”
The ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter was blasted toward Mars on a Proton rocket from the Baikonur cosmodrome in Kazakhstan in March 2016.
The robot spacecraft — a joint European-Russian mission — reached its target seven months later and released a small lander, called Schiaparelli, which was designed to test heat shields and parachutes in preparation for future landings.
However, the lander was destroyed when it crashed after its retro-thruster rockets shut off too early.
At the same time, the main orbiter swept into a highly elliptical path around Mars as planned.
Space engineers have since been altering that orbit — by repeatedly skimming the Martian atmosphere — so that the craft now circles the planet about 400km above the surface.
A few days ago engineers pointed its instruments toward the planet and began taking measurements.
Scientists expect that it will take more than a year to complete a full survey of the planet’s methane hotspots, but are hopeful that within a month or two they will have a good idea if its source is biological or geological in origin.
Astronomers have found hints of methane on Mars on several previous occasions.
In 2004, Europe’s Mars Express orbiter detected levels of methane in the atmosphere at about 10 parts in a billion.
Ten years later, NASA’s Curiosity rover recorded the presence of the gas on the surface.
Crucially, atmospheric methane breaks up quickly in the presence of ultraviolet solar radiation. Its continued presence on Mars therefore suggests it is being replenished from a source somewhere on the planet.
“We will look at sunlight as it passes through the Martian atmosphere and study how it is absorbed by methane molecules there,” project scientist Hakan Svedhem said. “We should be able to detect the presence of the gas to an accuracy of one molecule in every 10 billion molecules.”
If the methane is found to be biological in origin, two scenarios will have to be considered: either long-extinct microbes, which disappeared millions of years ago, have left the methane to seep slowly to the surface — or some very resistant methane-producing organisms still survive underground.
“Life could still be clinging on under the Martian surface,” Svedhem said.
However, if the gas is found to be geological in origin, the discovery could still have important implications.
On Earth, methane is produced — geologically — by a process known as “serpentinization,” which occurs when olivine, a mineral present on Mars, reacts with water.
“If we do find that methane is produced by geochemical processes on Mars, that will at least indicate that there must be liquid water beneath the planet’s surface — and given that water is crucial to life as we know it, that would be good news for those of us hoping to find living organisms on Mars one day,” McCaughrean said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers