When it comes to diagnosing the eccentricities of China, two figures stand out. One is Michel Oksenberg, a political scientist and China watcher at the US National Security Council during former US president Jimmy Carter’s administration, who bluntly described China as a rogue, specializing in getting something for nothing and being good at making verbal threats.
The other is Chinese centenarian Li Rui (李銳), who served as Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) personal secretary and biographer.
“We’ve ended up with [Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)] and his evil from a failure to address Mao’s defects,” Li said.
Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) once condemned Chinese communists as being “fierce on the surface, but weak at heart” and for waving their swords as soon as someone else shows theirs.
Mao called the US a “paper tiger,” but his own “backyard furnace” policy during the Great Leap Forward failed both the nation and its people.
Now, Xi is dreaming too much and is unsheathing his sword left, right and center, stirring up trouble in the East China Sea and the South China Sea, and upsetting the US, Japan, Taiwan and the Southeast Asian nations.
The US’ reaction has been the most drastic. During former president Barack Obama’s terms, when Chinese vessels intercepted US naval ships in the South China Sea, the US vessels made an emergency stop to avoid collision. Since US President Donald Trump took office, the US Navy is no longer intimidated by such moves and continue to sail straight ahead.
When Xi recently oversaw military drills in the South China Sea to much fanfare, China’s only, and antiquated, aircraft carrier joined the exercise.
The US, not even raising an eyebrow, sent an aircraft carrier battle group led by the USS Theodore Roosevelt directly into the exercise zone, daring China to block the way.
When China’s antiquated aircraft carrier returned to its home base via some detours, the US, Japan and Taiwan had full control of its route.
If that antiquated piece of metal ever attempted to take action, one wonders if it would be safe.
Meanwhile, Taiwan has highlighted its sovereignty and self-defense abilities by conducting its own naval drill.
Today, small countries are also capable of developing modern high-tech weapons without intending to invade other countries, instead developing military equipment allowing them to give their enemies a bloody nose and show them that they are capable of standing firmly against foreign threats and extortion.
Xi is playing the “one China” card, demanding that the international community recognize Taiwan as part of China, while at the same time playing the “anti-Taiwanese independence” card by intimidating those who support Taiwanese independence and do not consider Taiwan to be part of China, referring to them as “separatists.”
Such threats are typical of how China often tries to get something for nothing, and it is forcing Taiwan to play the sovereignty card.
The pursuit of better diplomatic relations and stronger national defense capabilities is intended to prove that Taiwan, or the nation called the “Republic of China on Taiwan,” is an independent nation.
The more pressure China exerts, the louder Taiwan will declare its sovereignty. If China waves its sword around, Taiwan will play its card and show that it is not intimidated by rogues.
James Wang is a senior media commentator.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers