There seems to be no respite from China’s pressuring of other countries to marginalize Taiwan, such as Man Booker International Prize nominee Wu Ming-yi (吳明益) being listed on the award’s Web site as a national of “Taiwan, China” and some nations changing how they officially refer to Taiwan or removing its flag from government Web sites.
These are among Beijing’s blatant bullying tactics that are obviously malicious and are easily recognizable by Taiwanese as something to get upset about and stand up against.
However, as the nation inches closer to local elections in November, lawmakers have again raised the issue of fake news, which made quite a stir in Taiwan about a year ago and was especially rampant during the push for pension reform by President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration.
As the fake news is likely to ramp up in the coming months as China seeks to influence the elections, it is worth bringing the issue to public attention.
On Saturday, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lin Chun-hsien (林俊憲) urged the government to take fake news seriously, calling for countermeasures to fight information coming out of Chinese content farms aimed at harming Taiwan, as well as the party. Propaganda and fake news have long been used to influence, but it is more important than ever that people are able to discern the veracity of Internet news sources, especially in Taiwan, which is prone to mass hysteria and where freedom of speech means susceptibility to false information from many fronts.
More unsettling is that Facebook has reportedly often been unresponsive to the government’s requests for help filtering or identifying fake news, while the privacy policies and data collection methods of other large social media platforms are unclear.
Lin urged the government to follow the EU’s example in imposing heavy penalties on fake news providers and over the misuse of personal information, saying that people who violate the EU regulations face fines of up to NT$800 million (US$27.45 million).
However, once the government starts regulating fake news — which often is not created or hosted in Taiwan — there is a risk that freedom of speech can be compromised.
Such measures would not be convincing, because the government is not neutral and has its own agenda — who knows if it would call something that paints the DPP in a bad light fake news?
Fake news can only go so far if people recognize it and stop sharing it, which remains the crux of the problem.
In addition to the malicious fake news from China, Taiwan faces a media economy where companies are willing to do anything to get hits. As long as the media and social media platforms are not held responsible for their content they will keep doing it because they are businesses that need to make a profit.
People no longer actively seek out news, they only skim whatever appears on their news feed without much thought, or share an article based on the headline and photograph without reading the article. In such cases, content farms do not even need to bother writing fake news, they just write a tantalizing headline and watch the magic happen. It should not be that easy, but it is.
No amount of government regulation can fix this cycle unless people take the threat seriously. Offering people an education in detecting fake news would keep people vigilant.
Only when people keep tabs on the media can there be the possibility of positive change in today’s media landscape.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past