The Taiwanese film Missing Johnny (強尼.凱克) was scheduled to premiere in China this month, but because Lawrence Ko's (柯宇綸) father, director Ko I-chen (柯一正), in the past made pro-Taiwanese statements, his son was branded a “pro-independence artist” and the film was blocked, as any film in which he is involved is barred from making money in China. This is yet another instance of China’s domineering and nefarious behavior.
In February, Zhangzhou Taiwanese Businessmen Association honorary chairman Lee Jung-fu (李榮福) voiced his support for the policies of Taiwan’s popularly elected president at a Straits Exchange Foundation activity.
As a result, he was expelled from the businesspeople’s association, under Chinese pressure of course, and all exchanges between him and Chinese companies were severed.
Lee is a Taiwanese who has invested in China, employs Chinese workers and helps China’s economic development. What is wrong about supporting the leader of his own country?
In a forced confession, he had to spend huge sums of money on half-page ads in the Chinese-language United Daily News and China Times to apologize and say that his statement had hurt the feelings of compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, in addition to voicing his opposition to Taiwanese independence and his support for the so-called “1992 consensus.”
It should not be forgotten that, in 1990, Taiwan allowed veterans to return to China, taking with them 40 years of savings and building homes there for their families. Businesspeople with their pockets full of New Taiwan dollars and US dollars went traveling in China, and some took advantage of the cheap labor to invest in factories. Before long, a lot of processing plants had relocated to China.
A friend who spent time in prison for his Marxist ideas took the few million NT dollars that he had managed to save after his release and earned from selling family property, and crossed the Taiwan Strait to help out poverty-stricken socialist China.
He ended up losing it all, because two people ganged up with local partners and took him to court. The experience upset him so much that he had a stroke. Unless you have Chinese contacts and bribe local leaders, it is not possible to succeed.
China later managed to get its act together, and now everyone has to do exactly as it says.
The result of Taiwanese risk-taking is that China has become wealthy, and after 5,000 years of authoritarianism, its first thought is to invade neighboring countries, as can be seen from several conflicts with the Soviet Union, India and Vietnam. Now Taiwan, which it was too weak to invade in the past, is a target for annexation.
There have been preposterous reports that China could crush Taiwan’s national defense in just three days, but that ignores the security cooperation among Taiwan, the US, Japan and South Korea, as well as the peace of all Asia-Pacific countries.
Even though several million people in Taiwan still cleave to China and want unification, they do not want to forgo the nation’s superior heathcare and retirement benefits.
Will the Chinese Communist Party’s missiles and bombs really be able to differentiate between pro-independence and pro-China supporters?
Taiwanese who want to make money in China must learn restraint and avoid saying what they think in public, but there is no need for them to say what they think — all they have to do is vote for the party that they support.
Shih Ming-hsiung is a political victim.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US