Like most teenagers, Ranim has yet to decide on a career, but the 17-year-old is certain of one thing: She must keep studying to make up for the time she spent out of school, fleeing the war in Syria to reach Austria’s capital.
Each week she and about one thousand other refugees and asylum seekers attend a free, council-run college set up by Vienna’s authorities to help young refugees learn German, get counseling, gain a basic education and integrate into society.
“As a refugee we need to know the language. At the same time, we need to keep learning the basic subjects in school like mathematics and English,” said Ranim, who two years ago became one of Vienna’s nearly 1.9 million residents.
“They created this college to give us more chances,” said Ranim, who declined to give her full name for privacy reasons.
As more people move around the world — spurred by conflict, climate extremes and poverty — the cities and countries that host new arrivals are trying to figure out what kind of welcome to offer.
Investing in the new arrivals, to prepare them to integrate into a new country, can cut the need to support them long term — but can sometimes also provoke resentment from local people who might not be offered similar services.
In Vienna, the left-leaning capital of the only western European country with a far-right-wing party in government, finding the correct balance can be particularly delicate.
REFUGEE INFLOW
In 2015, Austria took in asylum seekers equivalent to more than 1 percent of its population, most of them escaping conflict in the Middle East, Africa and Asia.
With about 93,250 refugees already living in Austria and tens of thousands of asylum applications in the system, according to the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Vienna’s city councilors have said that helping refugees become part of their new country is crucial.
“We felt there was a political obligation to support refugees from day one so that they have better prospects and better chances for a job,” said Philipp Lindner, a spokesman for Vienna’s education and integration department.
However, Vienna’s welcome for refugees is in some ways in direct opposition to the views of the national government.
In December last year, Austria’s anti-immigration Freedom Party and Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz’s conservatives struck a coalition deal to share power.
Both of Austria’s ruling parties have pledged to cut benefits for refugees and have warned that Muslim “parallel societies” are emerging in cities such as Vienna.
The Youth College for refugees is part of a wider council-led scheme to help them assimilate, Lindner said, adding that it includes sessions on how to access healthcare, education, housing and other services, as well as courses on sexual health, rights and cultural values.
Maria Steindl, who has managed the college since its inception in 2016, said that without this free education, young migrants “would be on the streets. They would not have jobs.”
“We are building a base so they can make their next steps,” she said.
URBAN REFUGEES
Today, about 60 percent of refugees worldwide live in cities, the UN agency has said.
That trend constitutes a significant shift from the traditional response, adopted by the UN a half-century ago, of sheltering displaced people in camps.
However, cities are sometimes struggling to adapt to the new responsibilities.
Mayors have said city authorities are increasingly called on as first responders to meet refugees’ basic needs, and are also required to take long-term responsibility for their well-being.
“Big cities have more challenges with migration than the countryside,” Lindner told the Thomson Reuters Foundation by telephone. “It’s the cities that have the obligation to provide housing, education and ... social welfare services.”
In October last year, UN High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi said that he believed cities should be given a bigger voice in deciding and implementing measures to deal with migration.
Planning ahead for refugees and implementing long-term integration programs is a cost-effective way for cities to deal with new arrivals, said Julien Simon of the Vienna-based International Centre for Migration Policy Development.
“When you don’t deal with an issue and you keep on postponing it, you will pay the price at some point,” said Simon, who is head of the center’s Mediterranean branch in Malta.
Helping refugees participate in city life is a “win-win,” because it helps them contribute positively to their new communities, he said.
BRIGHTER FUTURE?
However, at Vienna’s Youth College Steindl said it was challenging to keep refugee students motivated against Austria’s unfriendly political backdrop.
“Getting asylum status knocked back is a blow to their motivation, but that is the political framework in which we have to work,” Steindl said. “The best thing we can do is to invest in the training and education of these young people.”
For Iraqi refugee Alaa al-Dulaimi, the college has offered a chance to finish his interrupted high-school education.
“I didn’t go to school for almost three years, so I have forgotten a lot of subjects,” said al-Dulaimi, who arrived in Austria at the end of 2014, when he was 17.
With the help of social workers and teachers, the 20-year-old now hopes to pursue further studies, find a job and settle in Vienna for good.
“I feel very welcome. I have lots of friends from Austria. They are very kind people,” al-Dulaimi said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers