Tomorrow marks the 71st anniversary of the 228 Massacre, a calamity in the nation’s history that ushered in the White Terror era, during which many were imprisoned, tortured and killed.
While both the pan-blue and pan-green camps have held a series of events over the past few days to commemorate this tragic chapter, opinion about the truth behind it remains divided between two ends of the political spectrum.
Academia Sinica associate research fellow Chen Yi-shen (陳儀深) on Saturday said that probably about 20,000 people were killed, while some other historians estimate the casualties to have been up to 30,000.
On the other hand, former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Central Policy Committee director Alex Tsai (蔡正元) disputed the number, with Chunghwa Pan-Blue Alliance convener Lin Chung-shan (林忠山) saying that “only 862 died” during the Incident, and former KMT chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) on Sunday asking: “Is it really true that the government abused its power to kill innocent people?”
The issue of accountability for the 228 Massacre also remains divisive, with an investigative report titled 228 Incident: A Report on Responsibility, released in 2006 by a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-sponsored truth commission, naming Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) as the prime culprit, while Tsai and others, as recently as on Sunday, still maintained that Chiang did nothing wrong.
These disputes — let alone questions that persist for the families of many victims who still do not know why their loved ones were killed or where their remains were buried — suggest that more research is needed into the Incident and its aftermath.
Regarding Hung’s question and the remarks of other KMT politicians that more deliberation is needed to determine what exactly Chiang’s responsibility was in the Incident, as well as a call issued by hundreds of people — including centenarian Taiwanese independence advocate Su Beng (史明) — on Saturday in a march urging the government to uncover more truths about the 228 Incident, it is fair to say that a consensus does exist among pan-green and pan-blue members: More work must be done to uncover the one and only historical truth.
There are certainly several measures that both the DPP government and the KMT can take toward reaching this goal.
First, the government needs to take swift action in implementing the Act on Promoting Transitional Justice (促進轉型正義條例), which was passed on Dec. 5 last year. The law requires that the Executive Yuan set up a nine-member independent committee responsible for making political archives available and for investigating political persecution — among other measures set forth under the act.
However, no progress has been made in the formation of such a committee, other than an announcement that Minister Without Portfolio Lo Ping-cheng (羅秉成) has been put in charge of it.
In line with the act, the KMT, for its part, should take the initiative of providing unhindered access to its party archives and making documents related to the 228 Incident public.
Righting the Wrongs of the 228 Incident and Transitional Justice (二二八平反與轉型正義) editor Felicity Chiu (邱斐顯) noted recently that 228 Massacre victims are gradually passing away and that second-generation offspring who can pass on accounts of the tragedy are also aging, adding that “there is an urgent need to speed up the gathering of oral history from them.”
Time is of the essence in the work of uncovering the truth behind the 228 Massacre.
Instead of engaging in disputes, which only work to deepen the agony of the victims and their families, who yearn for truth and justice, both the governing party and the opposition should genuinely work together in unearthing the truth, together moving the nation toward reconciliation.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past