Taiwan appears to have a ship problem — not one like the Ching Fu Shipbuilding Co scandal, but one that poses substantial risks to the nation’s economy and its relations with the global community.
The problem — as highlighted by two recent reports — is two-pronged and will require hard work and tough policing by the government to resolve. The first problem involves the nation’s fisheries sector; the second is the use of Taiwanese-owned vessels to circumvent UN sanctions against North Korea.
A study published yesterday in Science magazine analyzed more than five years worth of data by Global Fishing Watch on where and when the world’s fishing fleets operate, quantifying what researchers have been warning about for years: The world’s oceans are being unsustainably overfished, putting marine life, the communities that depend on fishing and human nutrition at risk.
Taiwan’s fisheries industry, especially its distant-water fleet, has long been under fire over environmental and labor abuses, including illegal fishing and shark finning, actions that led the EU to issue the nation a “yellow card” in 2015, a warning that its seafood export trade could face repercussions.
According to the study, five nations were responsible for more than 85 percent of global fishing in 2016: Taiwan, China, Spain, Japan and North Korea. China far outstripped the others, with approximately 17 million hours of fishing, while Taiwan ranked a distant second, with 2.2 million hours of fishing.
While Taiwan’s contribution to the problem might be small compared with China, it is worth remembering that Taiwanese-flagged vessels account for more than one-third of the global longline tuna fleet — more than any other flag state — and that figure does include vessels owned or operated by Taiwanese that are registered under flags of convenience.
While President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration has pushed through laws to restrict transshipment at sea and toughen the penalties for illegal fishing and labor abuses, enforcement remains a problem, given the historical tolerance of abuses by the Fisheries Agency and the Executive Yuan.
A ministry for maritime affairs would be a step in the right direction, but efforts to create such a ministry, or even an ocean affairs council, have been stymied by the Legislative Yuan for years.
As interim measures, not only must the Fisheries Agency hire more personnel to enforce the new rules, the Coast Guard Administration should be deployed to combat illegal fishing practices and human trafficking.
As for the second problem, a Reuters story on Feb. 2 said a confidential report by independent UN monitors claimed that a network “primarily based” in Taiwan was responsible for ship-to-ship transfers of petroleum products to North Korea in violation of UN sanctions. The monitors told a UN Security Council sanctions committee the transfers had taken place between October last year and last month.
That would fit with the cases of suspicious shipments that the Ministry of Justice and Kaohsiung prosecutors last month said they were investigating, with one case involving Kaohsiung businessman Chen Shih-hsien (陳世憲) and his Bunker’s Taiwan Group Corp, and the other involving Chuang Chin-hung (莊錦宏).
While Premier William Lai (賴清德) in September last year invoked Article 5 of the Foreign Trade Act (貿易法) to ban all trading activities with North Korea in the wake of the UN’s latest sanctions against Pyongyang, the UN monitors’ report shows that the government will have to do more to stamp out such trade.
Yesterday’s announcement of a Cabinet reshuffle involving the heads of the ministries of foreign affairs and national defense and the National Security Council creates a fresh opportunity for Tsai’s administration to make reform of the fishing industry a priority and put an end to the sanctions-busting that is threatening Taiwan’s reputation as a responsible global citizen.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)