Taiwan is a country in a hurry. Since the momentous transition to democracy in the late 1980s and early 1990s, it has transformed itself into a rambunctious and freewheeling society, where change is happening fast.
The new freedoms gained since the early 1990s have led to transformation and new creativity in the arts, the economy, lifestyle and the political system. This “New Taiwan” also manifests itself in a (re)discovery of the Taiwanese identity and an emphasis on finding its own roots as a multicultural society with many different influences throughout its long and complex history.
Despite all this change, society is still struggling to resolve a number of legacies imposed by five decades of undemocratic one-party rule by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), which came over from China with Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) after 1945.
Taiwanese who suffered injustice during the period of White Terror and martial law are looking for transitional justice; the KMT, which enriched itself during its reign, needs to return its illegally acquired assets; teachers and other civil servants who received sky-high pensions from the government need to be brought to a level playing field; and judges and prosecutors who became instruments of the KMT’s partisan politics need to be brought to justice.
The list also extends to national status, sovereignty and international relations: The KMT’s policies of continuing pretense to represent China have driven Taiwan into international diplomatic isolation. Many in Taiwan feel that their new and democratic country deserves its rightful place as a full and equal member in the international family of nations.
They feel that normalization of relations, both with China and the rest of the world, would be the best way forward. They feel that the anachronistic “Republic of China” Constitution should be replaced by a new constitutional framework reflecting the present-day reality that Taiwan is a sovereign state in its own right.
The 2016 elections brought about a fundamental shift in the political landscape toward the Democratic Progressive Party. The administration of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) laid out an ambitious agenda of reforms and policies designated to strengthen democracy, the economy and enhance Taiwan’s international space. However, Tsai — not wanting to rock the boat in cross-strait relations — did vow to adhere to the “status quo.”
Tsai and her administration did work with the newly elected legislature to pass legislation to right many of the domestic wrongs outlined above. Some of her supporters feel that she should go farther and faster.
On some issues — such as judicial reform — she could indeed move faster, but for most of the other domestic reforms, it is important that the process is a truly bottom-up democratic process of give-and-take, and that takes time. And for that, time is on Taiwan’s side.
On international relations, the Tsai government has taken a very pragmatic and down-to-earth approach: maintaining the diplomatic ties the country has; strengthening the substantive relations with friends and allies, particularly in the West; reaching out to neighbors like Japan and South Korea; and initiating the New Southbound Policy to bolster ties with Southeast Asia.
On national status, sovereignty and the constitutional framework, Tsai and her government have maintained that under the present “status quo,” Taiwan is already a free and democratic nation, albeit still maintaining the formal “Republic of China” title. Any change needs to be decided by Taiwanese through a democratic process.
Some of her supporters also want her to go farther and faster on this. They feel that now is the time to let the world know that cross-strait relations should not be viewed through the dark specter of the old civil war between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party.
They feel that Taiwan’s international isolation should be a thing of the past and that the global community should work toward normal relations with a new and democratic Taiwan.
This will require ingenious diplomacy and out-of-the-box thinking, both by Taiwan and by its international friends and allies. And for that, time is on Taiwan’s side, too — but much work remains to be done.
Gerrit van der Wees is a former Dutch diplomat and was the editor of Taiwan Communique from 1980 through 2016.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS