Every Lunar New Year, the nation’s highways become jammed with vehicles as the great migration from north to south begins, and becomes congested again in the other direction when the holiday draws to a close.
Even if only one-tenth of the several million southerners who work in northern Taiwan returned home for the holiday, the highways would become choked with traffic.
This is Taiwan’s north-south problem in a nutshell. Northern Taiwan is home to the nation’s political, financial and academic centers, which pull on the south’s population and capital, leaving southern Taiwan marginalized.
In this year’s local elections, Pingtung County and Kaohsiung might each lose a legislative seat as a consequence of the south’s diminishing population, a direct result of marginalization.
It is not as if Pingtung County Commissioner Pan Men-an (潘孟安) or Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu (陳菊) have lacked effort, but no matter what they do, they will be no match for the north’s pull.
The kerfuffle over China’s unilateral opening of the northbound M503 flight route has also snowballed into a New Year problem that further amplifies the north-south divide.
The Civil Aeronautics Administration has denied requests from China Eastern Airlines and Xiamen Air for additional flights over the route that would have brought up to 60,000 Taiwanese home from China for the holiday.
If the planned additions from eight other Chinese carriers are factored in, the number rises from 176 flights to 489. If the scheduled and additional flights operated by Taiwanese carriers and the “small three links” are also included, then the number of China-based Taiwanese businesspeople returning home for the holidays probably equals the north-south migration.
The New Year north-south flood of traffic is symbolic of Taiwan’s north-south divide, while the wave of China-based Taiwanese businesspeople returning home is symbolic of Taiwan’s economic marginalization, a result of the pull of China’s economy since 2000.
Pro-China academics like to use pre-existing theories to explain away the nation’s economic woes. The administrations of former presidents Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) developed a plethora of plans to boost the economy and drum up investment, but failed.
China is the main cause of the nation’s economic problems, and the annual wave of Taiwanese businesspeople returning for the holiday makes it clear why domestic consumer growth keeps falling.
If hundreds of thousands — or even more than 1 million — of Taiwan’s strongest consumer groups are in China, of course domestic demand will wither. The result is falling domestic investment, wage stagnation and a depressed economy.
Frosty Chinese relations, the result of President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration not recognizing the so-called “one China” principle, has given Taiwan an 18-month window to take stock and rebuild its economic strength.
Last year, economic growth recovered to 2.58 percent from 0.81 percent in 2015. Beijing is well aware that the situation is advantageous to Taiwan and that it cannot allow the present state of affairs to continue.
Chinese Vice Premier Wang Yang (汪洋), who is about to take control of Taiwan issues, has emphasized the importance of “further integration of the economies on either side of the Strait.”
Wang intends to lure Taiwanese businesses and young people, as well as implement a policy to impoverish Taiwan.
The Tsai administration must not underestimate this threat to the nation’s economy. If it does, all of the government’s economic reform programs will be in vain.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser and former managing director and chairman of First Commercial Bank.
Translated by Edward Jones
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers