The National Women’s League’s decision on Wednesday not to surrender itself to transitional justice and set an example for other alleged Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) affiliates has once again proved that denial, self-justification and fear of change continue to be major hurdles on the nation’s path to closing the book on its authoritarian past.
Established in 1950 by then-president Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) wife, Soong Mayling (宋美齡), the league was initially known as the Anti-Communism and Anti-USSR Women’s League of the Republic of China, and aimed to unite the female population to take care of the families of soldiers that retreated to Taiwan with the Chiang and the KMT in 1949.
Between 1955 and 1989, it is estimated that the league accumulated NT$24.03 billion (US$823 million at the current exchange rate) from the so-called Military Benefit Tax, a tariff levied on the US dollar value of all imported goods during the period.
The amount would climb to NT$52.6 billion if inflation was factored in, or to NT$349.8 billion if interest was added, according to a report published on July 12 last year by the Cabinet’s Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee.
Some members of the league have lambasted the Democratic Progressive Party administration for labeling the league a KMT affiliate simply because it was founded by the wife of a dictator who ruled Taiwan for 25 years under a party-state system.
“Today’s women no longer have to take their husband’s name. Even back then, I doubt Chiang would dare to say his wife was his ‘affiliate,’” former KMT lawmaker Pan Wei-kang (潘維剛), a league member, told a news conference on Tuesday.
Pan even went so far as to draw a parallel between the committee’s probe of the league and the #MeToo online movement against sexual harassment.
The assumption that a wife is dependent on and tied to her husband in every aspect of her life is a patriarchal and politically incorrect concept.
However, Soong’s league is suspected of being affiliated with the KMT, not because of an outdated assumption, but because she headed both the league and the working meetings of the KMT’s Central Women’s Department, and had control over the personnel decisions for both bodies.
The anti-reform camp within the league has failed to address how a non-profit foundation was able to accumulate such a large amount of assets, if not through its link to the KMT regime, which allowed it to receive the military tax.
Blatantly ignoring these facts only suggests denial and blind self-justification on the league’s part and benefits neither the government nor the league itself.
The league’s continued denial has cost the government resources and manpower in the form of months of negotiations.
The league’s decision to renege on a memorandum of understanding to sign an administrative contract — which would have guaranteed its voluntary dissolution and donation of 90 percent of its total assets, or about NT$34.3 billion, to the state — will only see more government resources wasted on dealing with the league.
The decision will hardly ensure what the league says would be justice. It only delays the inevitable, which is the return of money the league amassed during the KMT’s party-state rule.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US