The National Women’s League’s decision on Wednesday not to surrender itself to transitional justice and set an example for other alleged Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) affiliates has once again proved that denial, self-justification and fear of change continue to be major hurdles on the nation’s path to closing the book on its authoritarian past.
Established in 1950 by then-president Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) wife, Soong Mayling (宋美齡), the league was initially known as the Anti-Communism and Anti-USSR Women’s League of the Republic of China, and aimed to unite the female population to take care of the families of soldiers that retreated to Taiwan with the Chiang and the KMT in 1949.
Between 1955 and 1989, it is estimated that the league accumulated NT$24.03 billion (US$823 million at the current exchange rate) from the so-called Military Benefit Tax, a tariff levied on the US dollar value of all imported goods during the period.
The amount would climb to NT$52.6 billion if inflation was factored in, or to NT$349.8 billion if interest was added, according to a report published on July 12 last year by the Cabinet’s Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee.
Some members of the league have lambasted the Democratic Progressive Party administration for labeling the league a KMT affiliate simply because it was founded by the wife of a dictator who ruled Taiwan for 25 years under a party-state system.
“Today’s women no longer have to take their husband’s name. Even back then, I doubt Chiang would dare to say his wife was his ‘affiliate,’” former KMT lawmaker Pan Wei-kang (潘維剛), a league member, told a news conference on Tuesday.
Pan even went so far as to draw a parallel between the committee’s probe of the league and the #MeToo online movement against sexual harassment.
The assumption that a wife is dependent on and tied to her husband in every aspect of her life is a patriarchal and politically incorrect concept.
However, Soong’s league is suspected of being affiliated with the KMT, not because of an outdated assumption, but because she headed both the league and the working meetings of the KMT’s Central Women’s Department, and had control over the personnel decisions for both bodies.
The anti-reform camp within the league has failed to address how a non-profit foundation was able to accumulate such a large amount of assets, if not through its link to the KMT regime, which allowed it to receive the military tax.
Blatantly ignoring these facts only suggests denial and blind self-justification on the league’s part and benefits neither the government nor the league itself.
The league’s continued denial has cost the government resources and manpower in the form of months of negotiations.
The league’s decision to renege on a memorandum of understanding to sign an administrative contract — which would have guaranteed its voluntary dissolution and donation of 90 percent of its total assets, or about NT$34.3 billion, to the state — will only see more government resources wasted on dealing with the league.
The decision will hardly ensure what the league says would be justice. It only delays the inevitable, which is the return of money the league amassed during the KMT’s party-state rule.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers