Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has unleashed the world’s biggest experiment aimed at taming runaway property prices.
After Xi in October used the Chinese Communist Party’s 19th National Congress to push a housing model that emphasizes renting, a flurry of activity is under way by developers, banks, local governments and even the biggest stock exchange. The push is the first of a package of programs, including a long-awaited property tax, poised to unfold over several years to rein in one of the world’s wildest real estate markets.
“China’s property market is on the brink of tremendous change,”said Shen Jianguang (沈建光), chief Asia economist at Mizuho Securities Asia Ltd in Hong Kong. “The push for rental properties shows a new model is starting to emerge.”
Xi is leveraging his immense power to try to solve a problem that has dogged policy makers around the globe: spiraling property prices in major metropolitan areas that have fueled rising inequality. The aim seems to be a new market model, somewhere between the capitalist frenzy that sent home prices in Shanghai and Beijing rocketing ever higher and the communist system under which dwellings were allocated by work units.
Establishing a vibrant rental market will help to defuse the risks from “irrational” home prices, said Deng Yongheng (鄧永恆) of the University of Wisconsin, who helped carry out a study that showed a 1,538 percent gain in land prices in Beijing from 2004 to 2016.
The long-term effects could range from driving consolidation among developers to fueling consumer spending as people pay less for housing, UBS Group AG economist Wang Tao (汪濤) wrote on Thursday.
Around China, large rental complexes are being completed, under construction or in planning, and funding for such projects is being made available. The changes could alter developers’ businesses, shake up government revenue and help make more Chinese citizens, like Germans, renters for life.
In theory, a thriving rental market would add housing supply and help stabilize prices after a 13-year property rally. The old model that prioritized home ownership encouraged “a lot of speculation and crazy price gains — and that model is coming to an end,” said Rosealea Yao (咬麗薔), an analyst at Gavekal Dragonomics in Beijing.
City governments from Beijing to Shanghai have earmarked public land to auction to property companies that would develop rental projects only. Country Garden Holdings Co, China’s largest developer by sales, has announced plans to make 1 million units available over three years. Banks are offering credit lines to developers for financing rental projects and the Shanghai Stock Exchange is encouraging the creation of investment products backed by rental income.
Xi is trying to alter the popular belief that property is a one-way bet, as any short-lived declines in prices have inevitably been followed by booms.
Homeownership rates in China are among the highest in the world, at almost 90 percent, according to Cushman and Wakefield Inc.
People also buy young. Parents often help their sons buy a place as a prerequisite for marriage.
Rentals, meanwhile, have been a hard sell, in part because of limited tenant rights and the low quality of much of the stock, with some units even lacking their own bathrooms and kitchens.
Even if the new policies can help change that mindset, challenges abound. First, China’s leaders have to ensure they are able to tame the market without tanking home prices. They will also have to balance other underlying drivers pointing to slowing demand. And officials would need to drop an old habit of letting prices boom whenever the economy needs a boost.
Still, the government’s backing means that the size of China’s rental market could drive annual rental payments to 4.2 trillion yuan (US$665 billion) by 2030, almost half of last year’s total home sales, according to estimates by Orient Securities Co.
Here are some of the steps taken by cities, developers and others to support the push:
Shanghai has allocated 42.5 million square meters of land for rental homes through 2020 — more than for housing earmarked for sale. That will add about 700,000 units by 2020, 41 percent of total supply. In Beijing, about 30 percent of new supply by 2021 is designated for rental dwellings.
Under a trial program in 13 cities including Guangzhou and Nanjing, rural collectively owned land can be converted into rental housing. Some cities are also encouraging the conversion of office buildings, malls and factories into rental units.
Some property firms are securitizing rental income into products that resemble real estate investment trusts. The Shanghai Stock Exchange approved such an offering from Poly Real Estate Group Co and called for developers to roll out more of the products.
China Construction Bank Corp plans to offer credit lines for rental projects. To lure tenants, the state lender devised a rare “rent loan” in Shenzhen to assist with their rent payments.
Without collateral, apartment tenants can borrow as much as 1 million yuan for as long as a decade, with interest rates cheaper than mortgages, Caixin magazine said.
China Vanke Co is targeting millennials with one-room apartments in former offices turned into dormitory-style accommodation in Shanghai, with rooms ranging from 14m2 to 20m2. The facility offers common areas, an indoor gym and vending machines for food and drinks.
About 95 percent of 395 units offered in the initial phases have been rented mostly to individuals under 32, Vanke Shanghai head for rental business Yan Yong said, adding that rents range from 2,600 to 3,400 yuan a month.
That is not bad for a city where home costs have soared to levels rivaling the world’s priciest market, Hong Kong.
Analysts said it could take years for the changes to take hold, but some cautioned against underestimating the resolve of Xi, perhaps China’s most powerful leader since Mao Zedong (毛澤東).
“When Xi started his anti-graft campaign years ago, people didn’t expect it to be so powerful, but it proved to be beyond imagination,” Shen said. “Now, most people still hold the belief that home prices will never fall, and speculation is rampant. That’s one place where Xi hasn’t succeeded. And that means policy execution will be heavier until his goal is achieved.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers