During an annual media event, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said she wanted over time to raise the minimum monthly wage to NT$30,000. This is to be commended, for it demonstrates vision, and vision informs policy.
Tsai’s administration has already proposed five major approaches to address the issue, including industrial upgrading and transformation, encouraging corporate-driven pay hikes and raising the minimum wage.
The Taipei Times on Tuesday published an opinion piece by a former National Taiwan University professor worried that using subsidies and other administrative incentives to drive up salaries would distort salary levels (“Pay raises cannot solve low wages,” Jan. 23, page 8).
The author also attributed Taiwan’s low wages to corporate structure, different skill levels among workers and the export-driven business model of original equipment manufacturing.
Nobody should expect such an issue to be resolved overnight. Despite a decade of debate between both sides of the aisle in the legislature and among the general public, the solution has remained elusive.
Like Tsai’s proposal of “industrial upgrading and transformation,” the professor’s suggestions are essentially stock answers for academics and politicians alike.
The administrations of former presidents Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) tried to tackle the problem according to such stock answers, but none of the policies worked.
The truth is that such causes are little more than scapegoats.
When Taiwan has Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and firms such as Largan Precision, whose stock price is just shy of NT$4,000, industrial transformation and upgrading is not really the issue, especially as many of these companies have created much higher added value than major US businesses.
Similarly, little ground is made by claiming that Taiwan’s investment environment has to be improved, or addressing the “five shortages,” as Taiwan consistently outperforms neighbors such as South Korea and China in international ratings in terms of business environment and global competitiveness.
The real culprit for low salaries is, and has always been, right in front of our noses, but is intentionally overlooked, either for ideological reasons or for avoiding an inconvenient truth: China’s magnetic draw. It is an exclusively Taiwanese problem for which the answer will never be found in economic theory.
About 80 percent of Taiwan’s listed companies do their manufacturing in China, not to mention the tens of thousands of its small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) conducting business there.
There are more than 100,000 Taiwanese companies in China, with about US$9 billion worth of government-approved direct investments, and about 1 million Taiwanese work in China. This means that China’s magnet effect is depriving Taiwan of an astonishing 10 percent of domestic consumption, a key reason for the nation’s low levels of consumption.
Not content with benefiting from the lower costs and China’s larger market, these Taiwanese businesspeople plunder the domestic and the international markets, refusing to share them with Taiwan’s SMEs, while at the same time dragging down the added value of Taiwan’s overall economics and trade.
These people are the real culprits behind Taiwan’s low-wage issue.
Strategies such as “optimizing the domestic investment environment” or “encouraging industrial upgrading and transformation” are of no use in the face of China’s magnetic effect. The only remedy for the low-income issue will be to prevent businesses from making further investments in China through tax regulations and administrative measures.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser and former managing director and chairman of First Commercial Bank.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers