See if you can guess the author of this quote: “The American Union feels itself to be a Nordic-German state and by no means an international porridge of peoples. This is revealed by its immigration quotas ... Scandinavians … then Englishmen and finally Germans have been accorded the largest contingent.”
Those words were written by Adolf Hitler in 1928, in praise of US immigration laws at the time. To be sure, references to Hitler should not be invoked lightly. For all the ugly things coming out of US President Donald Trump’s White House, not least his denigration of Haiti, El Salvador and African states as “shithole countries,” the US is still a long way from resembling Nazi Germany.
Trump is a knee-jerk authoritarian and a throwback to the old days of white supremacy in the US, but many more institutional checks would have to fail before he could bring about the end of US democracy.
Even with respect to immigration policy, there is a profound difference between the Trump administration’s mass deportations, however cruel and stupid, and mass murder.
Nonetheless, it has become increasingly clear that the 2016 US election installed an ignorant, racist president in the White House. Worse still, Trump’s statements in office hark back to a period in history when Hitler found inspiration in US immigration law.
Specifically, Hitler admired the US Immigration Act of 1924 — also known as the Johnson-Reed Act — which had erected openly racist barriers to immigration on the basis of a “national quota” system.
The law banned Arab and Asian immigration outright, and made immigration from Africa close to impossible. As Hitler noted, it also favored “Nordic-German” candidates for immigration and eventual US citizenship over Southern and Eastern Europeans, including Jews.
My own Jewish ancestors made it to Ellis Island in 1922, just under the wire.
It was this restrictive law that served as the legal basis for not accepting Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany in the years before the Holocaust.
The 1924 law is getting a lot of media attention in the wake of Trump’s suggestion that the US should take more immigrants from Norway (who are unlikely to immigrate), rather than places like Haiti.
However, it is hardly the only example of racist immigration policies in the US.
During the period of the so-called Yellow Peril in the late 19th century, the US enacted a raft of anti-Asian legislation, including an 1882 law banning immigration from China outright. All the way back in 1790, the US Congress revealed its racist outlook by offering naturalization to “any alien, being a free white person.”
Hitler, for his part, was not the first or only right-wing racist to find inspiration in these dark chapters of US history. By the time he came along, everyone on the European hard right was already well acquainted with the US model of race-based immigration barriers. After all, Theodor Fritsch, one of Europe’s most vile anti-Semites, had touted it decades earlier in his 1893 Handbook of the Jewish Question.
In Hitler’s manifesto Mein Kampf, he praised the US as “the one state” that was making progress toward becoming a racially healthy order, and when the Nazis came to power in the 1930s, Nazi lawyers carefully studied the US’ long history of policies to close its doors to non-whites.
Looking back, it is important to remember that it was not until the 1965 US Immigration and Nationality Act that the US began to separate itself from the worst aspects of its racist past.
As Trump’s presidency makes clear, that past has yet to be permanently overcome.
Trump’s recent vulgar remarks about immigration should prompt all Americans to remember that Hitler and his fellow Nazis were once big fans of the US. As we approach the first anniversary of Trump’s inauguration, his immigration policies should give pause to those taking comfort in the idea that US democracy has not yet been fatally undermined.
Whether or not US democracy will survive is not the standard by which to judge Trump’s presidency. After all, for white males at least, US democracy has always been alive and well, even when racist immigration laws were passed in 1790, in the late 19th century and in the 1920s.
The US’ history of democratically enacted racism is too sordid for people to be complacent about Trump’s recent comments and toxic immigration policies. Americans who love their country should feel sorrow when reading what Hitler said about it in 1928, and they should be dismayed to hear their president openly yearning for an immigration policy that would put Nordic people at the front of the line once again.
James Whitman is a professor of comparative and foreign law at Yale Law School.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers