Xiao Ercha lives in a tumbledown shanty beside a pigsty, thousands of kilometers and a world away from the awe-inspiring skyscrapers of Beijing and Shanghai. Tatty mosquito nets hang from the bamboo poles propping up its cracked asbestos roof, while kittens and chickens can be seen scuttling across the shack’s earthen floor.
When asked to name the leader of his nation, the second-largest economy on Earth, Xiao shook his head.
“Xi Jinping (習近平) who?” the 57-year-old farmer said. “I recognize his face from the television, but I do not know his name.”
That is about to change. For Xiao, who was born and raised in this tiny mountaintop hamlet near China’s southwestern borders with Myanmar and Laos, is one of millions of impoverished Chinese being relocated as part of an ambitious and politically charged push to “eradicate” extreme poverty in the world’s most populous nation.
Over the next three years Xi’s anti-poverty crusade — which the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader has declared one of the key themes of his second five-year term — will see millions of marginalized rural dwellers resettled in new, government-subsidized homes.
Some are being moved to distant urban housing estates, others just to slightly less remote or unforgiving rural locations. Other poverty-fighting tactics — including loans, promoting tourism and “pairing” impoverished families with local officials whose careers are tied to their plight — are also being used.
By 2020, Beijing hopes to have helped 30 million people rise above its official poverty line of about 6.16 yuan (US$0.95) a day, while simultaneously reinforcing the already considerable authority of Xi, now seen as China’s most powerful ruler since Mao Zedong (毛澤東).
China’s breathtaking economic ascent has helped hundreds of millions lift themselves from poverty since the 1980s, but in 2016 at least 5.7 percent of its rural population still lived in poverty, according to a recent UN report, with that number rising to as much as 10 percent in some western regions and 12 percent among some ethnic minorities.
A recent propaganda report claimed hitting the 2020 target would represent “a step against poverty unprecedented in human history.”
In his annual New Year address to the nation last week, Xi made a “solemn pledge” to win his war on want.
“Once made, a promise is as weighty as a thousand ounces of gold,” he said.
The wave of anti-poverty relocations — 9.81 million people are to be moved from 2016 to 2020 — are taking place across virtually the whole country, in 22 provinces. However, China’s western fringes, which still lag behind the prosperous east coast, are a particular focus.
Last year, Guizhou, China’s most deprived province, was aiming to move about 750,000 people to about 3,600 new locations. More than 1 million people were set to be moved in Gansu, Sichuan and Guangxi, while Yunnan Province hoped to move about 677,000 people to nearly 2,800 new villages.
One such community is Padangshang, an isolated hilltop hamlet in Yunnan’s Xishuangbanna Prefecture. Provincial officials describe Xishuangbanna, a tropical land of rolling, mist-shrouded hills and jaw-dropping amber sunsets, as one of four key anti-poverty battlefields.
Padangshang’s 143 residents — tea, nut and coffee farmers from the Hani ethnic minority — began moving to their new, bright-pink homes in early November last year after abandoning a nearby hilltop where access to water was difficult.
“We used to have to carry water up from the bottom of the hill. Now we have running water at home,” the community’s CCP chief, Liu Hengde, said during an interview in the lounge of his new home, which he had furnished with an L-shaped sofa and a flat-screen TV.
“The government is helping the ordinary folk lead a good life,” Liu, 30, added, before fastening a machete to the back of his navy-blue uniform and offering a tour of the newly built village to which 13 families had already moved.
“Xi Jinping always says that if we give the ordinary folk a better life, the whole country will be well off,” he said.
Relocated villagers gave Xi’s war on poverty — and their new two-story homes — their backing.
“When I was a boy I lived in a thick forest. There were insects and leeches everywhere. Transport was bad. The water supply was bad. The power supply was bad,” said Li Ade, a 30-year-old farmer. “These days, the Burmese [over the border] are living in the Mao era, while the lives of the Chinese people have improved.”
University of Melbourne academic Mark Wang, who studies Beijing’s use of resettlements to fight poverty, attributed Xi’s focus on the issue partly to the seven years he spent in the countryside during Mao’s Cultural Revolution.
Xi was born into China’s “red aristocracy” — the son of the revolutionary elder Xi Zhongxun (習仲勛) — but was exiled to the parched village of Liangjiahe in the 1960s after his father got on the wrong side of Mao.
Wang said that those years of rural hardship continue to shape Xi’s political priorities.
“From the bottom of his heart he knows the Chinese farmers. He understands what they want,” he said. “He even knows the dirty language the people use in the fields when they are farming.”
However, hard-nosed political calculations also explain Xi’s bid to paint himself as a champion of the poor — an effort undermined by a recent crackdown on migrants in Beijing, which has reportedly seen tens of thousands of poor workers forced from the capital.
“How can you make sure a billion people trust you and say: ‘This is our strong leader’?” Wang said, adding that one answer is waging war on poverty.
“This is something that will really make people say: ‘Oh, this is something new! At last somebody finally wants to fix this problem,’” he said.
The resettlements’ political function is unmissable in Padangshang, where posters of Xi visiting another of Yunnan’s ethnic minorities are plastered on virtually every new home.
“The government gave it to me. Every family got one,” 50-year-old builder Xiao Ziluo said, as he showed off his, which bore the slogan: “Build a Chinese dream with one heart.”
Experts question Beijing’s definition of poverty — the World Bank defines it as someone who lives on less than US$1.90 a day — and whether permanently vanquishing poverty is a realistic goal in such a short period. Others believe more emphasis should be placed on fighting urban deprivation.
However, Xiao declared himself a fan of his poverty-fighting president: “He is the chairman of China. That is why he is good.”
“He is the best,” Liu concurred.
Wang said he doubts Beijing would manage to completely defeat poverty in so short a time. However, given Xi’s daunting political stature, his decision to make the campaign a top political priority — and to make CCP cadres individually responsible for the plight of poor families in their areas — would have bureaucrats across the country scrambling to succeed.
“Every day local officials are thinking: ‘2020 is coming! Oh my god!’” he said.
The resettlements are the latest chapter in a decades-old Chinese tradition of moving people.
Countless millions have been asked — or ordered — to make way for major nation-building infrastructure projects such as the Three Gorges Dam, which displaced about 1.5 million, and the South-North water diversion, which dislodged at least 345,000.
Development-related relocations have proved highly controversial, with villagers often forced out with little, if any, help or compensation.
Wang said that poverty-related relocations, while not uncomplicated, are generally “the most friendly,” with those moved mostly allowed to hang on to their old homes and farmlands for a period of time.
“[With] all other resettlements they need something from you: ‘I need your land. I need you to move so I can build a reservoir. I need to convert your land into an industrial or urban [zone].’ For poverty alleviation resettlement the government does not want anything,” Wang added.
That might be overly generous.
Xiao Ercha, however, is thrilled with his new concrete-floored home, even if, lacking the funds to furnish it, he has yet to move in.
“It is good, good, good!” said the farmer, who estimated his annual income at about 1,935 yuan, as he walked up to the second-floor balcony of his recently completed abode, which boasts spectacular views over the surrounding countryside.
“I have never seen a house like this before,” he said.
Additional reporting by Wang Zhen
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US